Andre Dirrell calls out Golovkin, trololol

[Ray*]

I remember Gary Shaw saying at the end of the Froch fight that Dirrell gave it away by running in the last round. Never seen a pro run so much. Golovkin would murder him.

Dirrell lost that fight to Froch due to his lack of experience, he did learn from that fight though, he has got better since and I wouldn't rule him out against GGG depending on which weight class the fight happens at.

[From Russia]

We need electric fence around the ring, otherwise Dirrell will run away with a speed of a cheetah

[Foreign Soil]

We need electric fence around the ring, otherwise Dirrell will run away with a speed of a cheetah

Agreed. No amateur headgear to protect that weak will. No way Dirrell even fights GGG in the Pros. No heart.

[Light_Speed]

Dirrell beat him imo in the amateurs, Straight Robbery!!!!!!

He actually has an official win over GGG. They're officially 1-1 in the ams.

That's boxing fans for you, I didn't even see anything wrong in that interview or his facial expression in regards to question pose to him, but read the first page and its litter with comments about Dirrell trolling or his face regarding questions etc, you cannot win as a boxer sometimes.

I made the comment about his facial expression when he was asked about his next fight, because I know his career is in limbo since he signed with 50. This was not a diss, he's one of my favorite fighters, just a way to say his career is ****ed.

[P4P_No1]

Andre gets put into retirement if he fights GGG.

He wouldn't last the pace. GGG would break this kid's soul.

[Wokingman]

BEAT FROCH??? the press row, many stewart, jim watt, steve bunce, dan Rafael, the judges, allan green, graham Houston, big ragu etc all had froch winning.

A lot of people on here had froch winning including myself who was there live.

So don't make things up

Carl Froch had the homefeild advantage for that robbery. He didn't land anything except a bunch of rabbit and back punches. Dirrell was frustrating him and I think he even knocked the idiot down but he had to fight against the bias UK ref, crowd, and press and dirty tactics of Froch. I watch the fight live and subsequently since and I still have dirrell wining by at least three points

[-Kev-]

So if they were to fight and Golovkin somehow, in some miraculous way beat Andre, you wouldn't complain?

The one prediction I had wrong in the last 3 years was Sillakh decision over Kovalev. I bumped my own posts and admitted to being wrong. I'm not the type to disappear after a bad prediction. I get a lot more correct than not, so 1 wrong once in a while is nothing. At 168 current Dirrell beats Golovkin. If GG wins, then i'd admit to being wrong and that's that. I don't make excuses like most anti-Floyd fans do when he beats a fighter he was 'scared' of. Or the Matthysse fans claiming Garcia got lucky, and so on.

[FrankieBruno]

Make it happen this will be a good fight

[junior gong]

Dirrell has to be one of the most gutless fighters I have ever seen. Really strange dude, doesnt have any balls at all and yet chose boxing as his profession.

[SkillspayBills]

Methinks Dirrell would win the first 4 or 5 rounds of the bout right before he gets his ass starched.