Freddie roach"kovalaev picture perfect" Jim watt "kovalaev clumbsy"

[slimshandy69]

Freddie roach says kovalaev is his top prospect and said "he picture perfect" whereas Jim watt said before the Silaik fight tht hes "clumbsy and cumbersome".

Who do you agree with more as both are considered top pundits.

[GhostBlade]

Kovalev in my eyes is the current king of the light heavyweight division. He'll beat Stevenson if they ever do fight.

[Light_Speed]

Kovalev looks clumsy but he knows what he's doing. I think that's the reason why he was able to get so many high profile fights even though he's a monster. Matchmakers look at him on tape and they see a guy who doesn't look that skilled, but obviously it's very misleading.

[bojangles1987]

Jim Watt is an idiot, or blind. Don't know enough about him to be sure.

[Weebler I]

I don't see the clumsiness with Kovalev, he appears to be a good boxer with devastating power. Kind of like Matthysse really, except with more power PFP.

I don't agree with Roach either tho, I gave Sillakh the first round.

[mathed]

No, the way he was able to land cleanly with that jab to the body and get back out impressed me in the Sillakh fight; clumsy fighters get caught trying stuff like that. He has boxing skill and knows how to set punches up very well plus, he has extremely good timing and power.

[miniq]

Jimm Watt commentary is ****

[jas]

i lost some respect for jim watt after his disgustingly bias commentary in froch-groves.

[From Russia]

Haha, not only he got the most annoying voice i ever heard, but he is also dumb and biased as ****

[Foreign Soil]

Haha, not only he got the most annoying voice i ever heard, but he is also dumb and biased as ****

Agreed. ****ing great Av, btw.