Quitting during a boxing match is generally considered taboo and usually frowned upon by the audience, the critics and even the boxers own team. It is a decision which often lingers with a fighter for much, if not all, of his career.
A few examples include Devon Alexander who quit against Bradley, Vitali Klitschko who quit against Byrd, Chad Dawson quitting against Ward and, perhaps the most prolific in recent times, Victor Ortiz quitting against Maidana. The list goes on, quitting isn't the most uncommon act in the ring, this is a brutal sport.
But can quitters ever be forgiven and can they eradicate the label of being a "quitter" or is it something that is permanently engraved onto their legacy and in fact has a direct impact when considering that fighters resume and historical status? Is it "Once a quitter, always a quitter" or do certain fighters remove the "quitter" label through their subsequent achievements?
A few examples include Devon Alexander who quit against Bradley, Vitali Klitschko who quit against Byrd, Chad Dawson quitting against Ward and, perhaps the most prolific in recent times, Victor Ortiz quitting against Maidana. The list goes on, quitting isn't the most uncommon act in the ring, this is a brutal sport.
But can quitters ever be forgiven and can they eradicate the label of being a "quitter" or is it something that is permanently engraved onto their legacy and in fact has a direct impact when considering that fighters resume and historical status? Is it "Once a quitter, always a quitter" or do certain fighters remove the "quitter" label through their subsequent achievements?
Comment