So what do you think Cotto's response would be? He has "until next week to take the offer." I'd be curious who Canelo's choice would be if Cotto turns it down. What's your guess?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Canelo's Camp Gives Cotto Ultimatum: "You Have Until next Week To Take The Offer"
Collapse
-
Originally posted by -Kev- View PostBut what happened El Angel? You said all Clottey did was block, then I showed you that he significantly outlander Cotto by a wide margin. Then you try to make it seem as if I was crazy for having Murray beating Martinez but it's 55 to 60 in favor of Martinez and now you say "the majority" voted for Martinez. You don't even know what the majority is. How is more members saying, equal the majority?
I can't wait to bump your silly posts when Canelo beats Cotto.
He landed more than Cotto because he dominated rounds 7-10, where he built a small lead and built the Compubox edge. Fights are scored by rounds, and Cotto needed to win 6 rounds to get the win over Clottey with the KD. He clearly did.
You're not crazy because you thought they won, you're just wrong.
Comment
-
Kev found evidence refuting that Clottey just blocked the whole fight. That was pure PWNAGE.
A poll on BS =/= majority. Have you read the **** people post on here? A true majority would see how the press scored the fight. Too many stans & haters on this site for anything to be credible imo.
Comment
-
Originally posted by robust_ View PostKev found evidence refuting that Clottey just blocked the whole fight. That was pure PWNAGE.
A poll on BS =/= majority. Have you read the **** people post on here? A true majority would see how the press scored the fight. Too many stans & haters on this site for anything to be credible imo.
Clottey built that Compubox lead up in round 7-10, then let it slip away by just blocking and not returning fire in the late rounds. The press, at least according the RING article on the fight had Cotto winning because of the 1st rd KD. That was huge in the scoring and is a big reason he wins on most cards for that fight.
Comment
-
Originally posted by El Angel View PostSo when he posted a thread to refence, that's PWNAGE, but when I do it, it's BS. Gotcha
Clottey built that Compubox lead up in round 7-10, then let it slip away by just blocking and not returning fire in the late rounds. The press, at least according the RING article on the fight had Cotto winning because of the 1st rd KD. That was huge in the scoring and is a big reason he wins on most cards for that fight.
Using compubox or press scorecards is much more credible evidence than a poll online, especially coming form this site. People here post (and vote) with their hearts, not their minds.
Also, no need to be defensive, amigo. We're all wrong sometimes.
Comment
-
Originally posted by robust_ View PostWhat I said was neutral, bro. You both cite a boxingscene polls as evidence, and that's just silly.
Using compubox or press scorecards is much more credible evidence than a poll online, especially coming form this site. People here post (and vote) with their hearts, not their minds.
Also, no need to be defensive, amigo. We're all wrong sometimes.
Fightscore didn't do Cotto-Clottey and the only collection of ringside scores I've found had it for Cotto based on the KD in the 1st usually.
Kev and me also have a little history.Nothing towards you.
Comment
-
I was on a laptop which I am not used to so I made some typos like outlanded, and completely missed saying "How is only 5 more people saying Martinez equal the majority?".
Really, 55 vs 60 with 11 draws is nothing to prove that the majority of members thought Martinez won.
And I still proved that Clottey did a lot more than just block punches. He landed more punches and Cotto gassed and should have lost the fight.
Comment
-
Originally posted by El Angel View PostI'm not defensive, I honestly didn't think you were being neutral either.
Fightscore didn't do Cotto-Clottey and the only collection of ringside scores I've found had it for Cotto based on the KD in the 1st usually.
Kev and me also have a little history.Nothing towards you.
I enjoyed reading both of you got at it. It's rare you get a good debate going on this site.
Comment
Comment