Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Player 3 has entered the Cotto Race.... PACQUIAO!

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #71
    Originally posted by Pacquiao'd View Post
    What's funny is the same people who trashed Floyd for fighting cotto and didn't give I'm credit for winning would give manny credit just like they do with Marquez. Ha
    funny thing is manny already fought cotto...... before floyd did so u can throw that one out the window.

    Comment


    • #72
      Originally posted by Evol View Post
      funny thing is manny already fought cotto...... before floyd did so u can throw that one out the window.
      And your point is? Go ahead and say something PAC-tarded

      Comment


      • #73
        Originally posted by Pacquiao'd View Post
        And your point is? Go ahead and say something PAC-tarded
        im a flomos and my point is how are people gonna discredit floyd's win over cotto and give pac credit if pac fights cotto when pac already did back in 09 lmao! i think the word tard suits u better.

        Comment


        • #74
          Originally posted by Bushbaby View Post
          Who requested 150?? Team Pacman wanted 147 and 148 at the highest. I understand that as a Pacman fan you're heavily biased, but to quote people defending a catchweight is truly disturbing.
          You've seen these links many times. Keeps forgetting, eh?

          http://www.boxingscene.com/cotto-pac...-go-154--48943
          http://espn.go.com/boxing/story/_/id...rematch-boxing

          So Pac wouldn't go beyond 147, as promised after Marg. Cotto taunted him into offering 150. Pac did, Cotto rejected blaming the weight and money. Then looked greatly undersized vs Trout, for 1m in purse.

          I don't wanna catch you again posting this ****, capiche?

          Oh, and defend this:

          http://espn.go.com/boxing/story/_/id...onio-margarito

          Comment


          • #75

            Comment


            • #76
              Originally posted by Evol View Post
              im a flomos and my point is how are people gonna discredit floyd's win over cotto and give pac credit if pac fights cotto when pac already did back in 09 lmao! i think the word tard suits u better.
              If they were to fight again. Tards would give PAC credit although they didn't with Floyd. Hell. They give PAC credit for fight drained to **** Dlh after Floyd but not Floyd for fighting Dlh at his weight first


              Keep up.
              Last edited by Pacquiao'd; 11-25-2013, 04:57 PM.

              Comment


              • #77
                Originally posted by Pacquiao'd View Post
                If they were to fight again. Tards would give PAC credit although they didn't with Floyd. Hell. They give PAC credit for fight drained to **** Dlh after Floyd but not Floyd for fighting Dlh at his weight.


                Keep up.
                u dont make any sense pac/cotto already happen, if they give pac credit again then it must be from the ass whooping pac delivered. and pac/oscar was oscar's idea but lets blame pac right? and u know what? the same can be said about u. give floyd credit for hatton but ignores pac's win over him, give floyd credit for mosley but ignores pac's shut out over him. want me to keep going? can u keep up? lmao!!

                Comment


                • #78
                  Originally posted by Pacquiao'd View Post
                  If they were to fight again. Tards would give PAC credit although they didn't with Floyd. Hell. They give PAC credit for fight drained to **** Dlh after Floyd but not Floyd for fighting Dlh at his weight.


                  Keep up.
                  cotto almost won over your gay hero while pac beat the crap out of him. dela hoya challenged pac at 147 and not the other way around.

                  so, how many years in a decade, again?

                  Comment


                  • #79
                    Originally posted by Evol View Post
                    u dont make any sense pac/cotto already happen, if they give pac credit again then it must be from the ass whooping pac delivered. and pac/oscar was oscar's idea but lets blame pac right? and u know what? the same can be said about u. give floyd credit for hatton but ignores pac's win over him, give floyd credit for mosley but ignores pac's shut out over him. want me to keep going? can u keep up? lmao!!
                    It's clear your slow ass doesn't get the irony I speak of.

                    Move along

                    Comment


                    • #80
                      Originally posted by Kuyukut View Post
                      cotto almost won over your gay hero while pac beat the crap out of him. dela hoya challenged pac at 147 and not the other way around.

                      so, how many years in a decade, again?
                      Move along tard

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP