Tweet
Sky sports "team" just root for the younger fighter.
Now I personally scored Marquez v Bradley a draw, but have no beef with people saying Bradely won. At all. However Sky sports started slated the fact it was a close decision win for Bradley and they were arse licking Bradley all through the fight whilst ignoring Marquez shots.
Exact same thing has happened with froch groves, I have no problem people thinking Groves was winning. I personally had groves up a point going into the 9th, but sky sports, and the worse culprits are jim watt and Glen Mclory. They were awful in the Bradley fight saying that anyone who scored that close "know nothing about boxing"
Same with Froch Groves both Glen mclory and Jim watt showed utter contempt for Carl froch. ignoring his landing jabs and body shots.
So whats there weird agenda. its obviously, money. They know that both Froch and Marquez are both at the twilights of their careers so wil root against them as more money in Bradley and Groves as both are younger guys.
Does anyone else agree with this theory?
Exact same thing has happened with froch groves, I have no problem people thinking Groves was winning. I personally had groves up a point going into the 9th, but sky sports, and the worse culprits are jim watt and Glen Mclory. They were awful in the Bradley fight saying that anyone who scored that close "know nothing about boxing"
Same with Froch Groves both Glen mclory and Jim watt showed utter contempt for Carl froch. ignoring his landing jabs and body shots.
So whats there weird agenda. its obviously, money. They know that both Froch and Marquez are both at the twilights of their careers so wil root against them as more money in Bradley and Groves as both are younger guys.
Does anyone else agree with this theory?
Comment