Should the referee have stopped the fight?

[CraigM]

25 No's to 2 Yes's

Says everything.

[Daddy T]

Looks like Carl Froch and Howard Foster found this thread.

[Curtiz]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kXw3oYKKN3A

The CHAMP , explains it perfect

[yoz]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kXw3oYKKN3A


The CHAMP , explains it perfect

Adam Booth's rent boy ^^^^^^.

[yoz]

25 No's to 2 Yes's

Says everything.

It was a premature stoppage; I don't think anyone is contesting that.

[-MAKAVELLI-]

i think the refs for Groves-Froch and PAC-Rios should have switched

[ShoulderRoll]

Froch was hurt worse at a couple of points in the fight and the ref never stopped it. Groves deserved that same chance.

[Sceptic]

Of course it was a very bad stoppage!

[ShoulderRoll]

The poll results are definitely one sided.

[DeltaSigChi4]

My question is how the **** can two judges have the fight so close at that point (76-75, Groves)? I mean Froch was on the way to winning that round, so it was going to be a draw at the point for those two judges. Are they ****ing blind? Two corrupt judges, one corrupt referee; Groves still almost won.