Comments Thread For: Salido-Lomachenko, Vazquez-Shafikov Verbal Deals

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • .:: JSFD26 ::.
    Brawski
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Mar 2012
    • 33329
    • 725
    • 432
    • 44,762

    #21
    Originally posted by bigcursedawg
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Mikhnienko

    What you said doesnt make sense i assume you mean win a title in their debut. No, nobody has ever done that the record is 3 so the point of doing it in 2 is obvious.

    To bad Lomachenko already has 7 pro bouts. He was paid to fight in the wsb so officially Lomachenko isn't breaking any records.
    This is a good point.

    They didn't count them towards his record tho right? But for the Americans they did?


    Posted from Boxingscene.com App for Android

    Comment

    • MEXGBP
      Interim Champion
      Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
      • Jul 2008
      • 759
      • 46
      • 105
      • 9,306

      #22
      I hope this fight is in southern cali

      Comment

      • lutenco
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Jul 2009
        • 2300
        • 85
        • 1
        • 9,040

        #23
        I can't wait for SALIDO-LOMACHENKO especially i'm curious how good will be LOMACHENKO in the second part of the fight because i see this fight go to the distance!

        Comment

        • ShoulderRoll
          Join The Great Resist
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Oct 2009
          • 55892
          • 10,015
          • 5,015
          • 763,445

          #24
          Originally posted by daggum
          they will probably pay chavez jr 2 mill for this crap yet give golovking 400k per fight.
          Chavez Jr has a bigger fanbase than Golovkin. They don't call him the Dinero de Vaca for nothing.

          Comment

          • Levity
            Interim Champion
            Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
            • Jan 2013
            • 578
            • 31
            • 2
            • 6,944

            #25
            If being paid = professional, there are virtually no amateur boxers outside local competitions. Even a 5 year old whose father gave him a dollar to box in a tournament would be a pro.

            I think there are other grounds for saying that Lomochenko has more pro experience than one bout, but the distinction between what is typically called amateur boxing and what is typically called professional boxing is based on more than payment.

            Comment

            • HanzGruber
              STRAPMEUP
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Dec 2011
              • 29824
              • 1,069
              • 238
              • 81,632

              #26
              Why ar they doing this in china? Wtf

              Comment

              • daggum
                All time great
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Feb 2008
                • 43380
                • 4,524
                • 3
                • 166,270

                #27
                Originally posted by ShoulderRoll
                Chavez Jr has a bigger fanbase than Golovkin. They don't call him the Dinero de Vaca for nothing.
                golovking did better ratings than chavez jr so nope

                Comment

                • Art-illery
                  Contender
                  Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                  • May 2010
                  • 252
                  • 18
                  • 0
                  • 6,330

                  #28
                  Originally posted by bigcursedawg
                  To bad Lomachenko already has 7 pro bouts. He was paid to fight in the wsb so officially Lomachenko isn't breaking any records.
                  I was thinking of something along those lines too. Are fights in the WSB counted as full out PROFESSIONAL fights that go on record? If so, I'd like to see proof of such a rule.

                  Comment

                  • .:: JSFD26 ::.
                    Brawski
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Mar 2012
                    • 33329
                    • 725
                    • 432
                    • 44,762

                    #29
                    Originally posted by Art-illery
                    Quote:

                    Originally Posted by bigcursedawg

                    To bad Lomachenko already has 7 pro bouts. He was paid to fight in the wsb so officially Lomachenko isn't breaking any records.

                    I was thinking of something along those lines too. Are fights in the WSB counted as full out PROFESSIONAL fights that go on record? If so, I'd like to see proof of such a rule.
                    The Americans who fought in the WSB had those fights counted towards their pro record and some of them were losses too.


                    Posted from Boxingscene.com App for Android

                    Comment

                    • ShoulderRoll
                      Join The Great Resist
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Oct 2009
                      • 55892
                      • 10,015
                      • 5,015
                      • 763,445

                      #30
                      Originally posted by daggum
                      golovking did better ratings than chavez jr so nope

                      Wrong.

                      "HBO’s telecast of Gennady Golovkin vs. Curtis Stevens on Saturday night from New York attracted 1,410,000 viewers, according to Nielsen Media Research. That’s 29% above Golovkin’s bout with Matthew Macklin (1,097,000 viewers) on June 29 and ranks as HBO’s & cable’s third most watched boxing match this year (trailing only the HBO telecasts of: Cotto vs. Rodriguez 1,555,000 viewers and Chavez Jr. vs. Vera 1,416,000 viewers)"

                      http://boxingbb.com/showthread.php?m...3471&pid=56148

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP