Most people I know had Pacquiao, Marquez and Provodnikov beating Timothy Bradley, he should really have 3 losses on his record. But, as a U.S. citizen, and with all 3 contests being staged in his home country, Bradley was erroneously awarded gift decisions in all 3 fights..
If we take the case of Bradley individually - a born and bred U.S. citizen going against "foreign" fighters (Pac, Marquez, Prov) in his own home country - is Bradley's story enough to reinforce the perspective that the U.S. is possibly the most corrupt nation in the history of boxing?
I mean, for one single individual to be given 3 gift decisions / robberies in a row against fighters that beat him - doesn't that say a lot about the U.S. in terms of it's ability to fairly adjudicate a boxing bout??
If we take the case of Bradley individually - a born and bred U.S. citizen going against "foreign" fighters (Pac, Marquez, Prov) in his own home country - is Bradley's story enough to reinforce the perspective that the U.S. is possibly the most corrupt nation in the history of boxing?
I mean, for one single individual to be given 3 gift decisions / robberies in a row against fighters that beat him - doesn't that say a lot about the U.S. in terms of it's ability to fairly adjudicate a boxing bout??
Comment