WBO orders Burns vs Crawford negotiations

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ladiesman217
    No sacrifice, no victory
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Nov 2007
    • 1017
    • 36
    • 24
    • 10,659

    #11
    Hope this happens. I hate it when fighters avoid mandatory defenses.

    Comment

    • _original_
      Dinamita
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Jul 2009
      • 17838
      • 1,872
      • 789
      • 67,167

      #12
      Crawford by easy and boring UD.

      Comment

      • 285Kid
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Jan 2012
        • 7102
        • 91
        • 0
        • 14,777

        #13
        Originally posted by Sweet Pea 50
        I thought the Beltran rematch was a done deal already? Am I missing something here? Someone clue a cracker in.
        Team Beltran wanted the rematch out side of Glasgow. Beltran team probably turn it down

        Comment

        • taansend
          In denial about UK refs
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Jan 2004
          • 2444
          • 157
          • 428
          • 9,153

          #14
          Beltran got robbed in that fight but it's a blessing in disguise for him. He'll earn more in the rematch than he would have for being served up as a sacrificial lamb against Crawford.

          Should he win the rematch he gets the bout but with a nice retirement fund set up.

          They should make sure they don't use my fellow Americans as judges as he's the one that gave the fight to Burns.

          Comment

          Working...
          TOP