WBO belts

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Exciterx30
    El Intocable Bass Machine
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Jan 2004
    • 3867
    • 179
    • 64
    • 10,669

    #1

    WBO belts

    I already posted this on another thread but to make sure that some members read it, I'll post it here.

    Why is the WBO so lightly regarded? I've heard about the fishy rankings and all that but still,some of the top fighters in their divisions are currently WBO champs. Some are Ivan Calderón(105),Diego Corrales(135),Miguel Cotto(140),Antonio Margarito(147),Bernard Hopkins(160),and Joe Calzaghe(168).
  • Neuraxis
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Sep 2004
    • 2775
    • 118
    • 274
    • 9,132

    #2
    Not to mention that the light heavyweight linear champion only had the WBO belt because all of the other belts either screwed or bent over for Roy Jones Jr.

    Comment

    • neils7147933
      Boxingscene Icon
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Sep 2004
      • 16261
      • 946
      • 2,279
      • 26,752

      #3
      The WBO belt used to be a paper belt. If the champion fought for one of the "Big 3" belts, the WBO would strip them.

      I hope they discontinue this practice. Having Cotto or Corrales carry their belt is a credit to their organization.

      When the WBA will strip the champ, call them "super" and then set up another "title" fight, the WBO is becoming much more legitimate.

      Even HBO & Showtime acknowledge when it is a WBO title fight, unlike the IBA, WBU, NABF,etc.

      They even call Lamon Brewster one of 4 heavyweight "Champs", which is a new thing. No one was calling W. Klitschko or Sanders "champ"

      Comment

      • Neuraxis
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Sep 2004
        • 2775
        • 118
        • 274
        • 9,132

        #4
        Originally posted by neils7147933
        The WBO belt used to be a paper belt. If the champion fought for one of the "Big 3" belts, the WBO would strip them.

        I hope they discontinue this practice. Having Cotto or Corrales carry their belt is a credit to their organization.

        When the WBA will strip the champ, call them "super" and then set up another "title" fight, the WBO is becoming much more legitimate.

        Even HBO & Showtime acknowledge when it is a WBO title fight, unlike the IBA, WBU, NABF,etc.

        They even call Lamon Brewster one of 4 heavyweight "Champs", which is a new thing. No one was calling W. Klitschko or Sanders "champ"
        I guess the folks at Showtime don't count.

        Comment

        • neils7147933
          Boxingscene Icon
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Sep 2004
          • 16261
          • 946
          • 2,279
          • 26,752

          #5
          Originally posted by Neuraxis
          I guess the folks at Showtime don't count.
          Sorry, I don't follow you.

          Comment

          • Neuraxis
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Sep 2004
            • 2775
            • 118
            • 274
            • 9,132

            #6
            I think it was Vitali against Obed Sullivan on Showtime and they were talking about he was the only with a heavyweight title belt besides Lewis.

            Comment

            • neils7147933
              Boxingscene Icon
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • Sep 2004
              • 16261
              • 946
              • 2,279
              • 26,752

              #7
              My bad - I didn't remember that. A lot of stations always made the distinction between "titleholders" and "champs". When Vitali fought Sanders, I remember seeing the other 3 champs in the online poll for HBO as to who was the real champ and was surprised to see Brewster there. The people I were watching with agreed with me.

              Sorry about the false information- I'll own up to it when I'm wrong.

              Comment

              • Neuraxis
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Sep 2004
                • 2775
                • 118
                • 274
                • 9,132

                #8
                Originally posted by neils7147933
                My bad - I didn't remember that. A lot of stations always made the distinction between "titleholders" and "champs". When Vitali fought Sanders, I remember seeing the other 3 champs in the online poll for HBO as to who was the real champ and was surprised to see Brewster there. The people I were watching with agreed with me.

                Sorry about the false information- I'll own up to it when I'm wrong.
                Yeah HBO really contradicted itself that night too. When Sanders was making his entrance they said that it was his first title fight.

                Comment

                • Neuraxis
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Sep 2004
                  • 2775
                  • 118
                  • 274
                  • 9,132

                  #9
                  Originally posted by neils7147933
                  My bad - I didn't remember that. A lot of stations always made the distinction between "titleholders" and "champs". When Vitali fought Sanders, I remember seeing the other 3 champs in the online poll for HBO as to who was the real champ and was surprised to see Brewster there. The people I were watching with agreed with me.

                  Sorry about the false information- I'll own up to it when I'm wrong.
                  You would have had to have seen the fight to have made a mistake. It seems like Showtime because it has more WBO beltholders than HBO that it would want the WBO belt to be considered as good as the others.

                  Comment

                  • neils7147933
                    Boxingscene Icon
                    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                    • Sep 2004
                    • 16261
                    • 946
                    • 2,279
                    • 26,752

                    #10
                    Did you notice during the previews for DLH/Hopkins that Hopkins held his three belts but Oscar didn't his? I wonder if it was because it was a minor belt - or that Oscar wanted people to forget how he "won" that belt.

                    I see the WBO belt becoming one of the big 4 very soon. That being said, belts are less and less important anyway. I think it was the Rico Hoye vs. Montell Griffin fight where Hoye was fighting to earn the #1 contender spot for the IBF light heavyweight belt (bad decision win for Hoye - but off topic). This "prospect" looking for his shot at being a "champ" already was carrying multiple belts to the ring.

                    Though the WBA belt used to be a great one to hold, those working below the "super" champ have to be self-conscious about carrying it to the ring. Maybe the WBO belt will surpass that one as one of the 3 most prestigious titles.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP