Is this a coincidence? both relied on speed,and athleticism and lacked fundamentals. Neither possessed the fundamental skills to have a long career,just found this strange
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
The last 2 "fighter of the decades" where kod cold a couple years into the new decade
Collapse
-
-
-
Floyd could've been the fighter of the decade if his dumbass didn't decide to retire in the first place.
Comment
-
Originally posted by -MAKAVELLI- View Postsee? good thing Floyd didn't win it right?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Money Team. View PostIs this a coincidence? both relied on speed,and athleticism and lacked fundamentals. Neither possessed the fundamental skills to have a long career,just found this strange
Pacquiao became a professional in '95 and has had over 60 fights
Comment
-
Yea floyd should've been fighter of the decade if only he didn't retire. I can't lie tho 2006-2009 manny was dominating so it was really a toss up. Interesting fact tho.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Money Team. View PostIt just seems the award is handed out to excitement rather then fundamental fighters who remain steady and on top..in the 90's Whitaker could easily have gotten it,in the 2000's Floyd could have easily gotten it..but it seems they do not award defensive fighters
Had Floyd not retired and beaten the likes of Marg, Mosley and Cotto he may have won it.Last edited by rr00676; 11-06-2013, 07:04 PM.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Russian Crushin View PostFinally you acknowledge that pac was FOTD
Comment
Comment