Tweet
Originally posted by PBP
View Post
1. "Exposed" is a term used by all races. It was used for Jeff Lacy, it was used for Andre Berto, it was used for Adrien Broner, it was used for Gary Russell Jr., it was used for Deontay Wilder, it was used for Devon Alexander, it was used for Timothy Bradley. And it wasn't just "hood ****" using that term.
2. The threads criticizing GGG have been talking about his skills. His inability to fight off his back foot, his loading up on every shot and the types of fighters that they predict he will struggle with. ALL BOXING RELATED "SKILLS" DISCUSSIONS"
Yet...95% of people making these criticisms have admitted that he beats EVERY SINGLE MW IN THE WORLD RIGHT NOW, except maybe Sergio Martinez.
But that's hating, because he is not being ****ridden and put on a godly pedastal like his obsessed fanboys. Which tells me this:
Some people possess the ability to discuss this sport intelligently. They can identify flaws in a fighters style, they can breakdown style clashes and matchups and make informed educated judgements on certain fighters. Do they have a bias in the types of styles they prefer, I'm sure they do. But as long as its intelligent boxing discussion, who cares?
Others, don't know enough about the sport itself and don't have the ability to counter these arguments constructively criticizing their favorite fighters style and possible *****s in his armor. Since they don't have the ability to discuss boxing intelligently, they make excuses as to why not everybody puts their favorite fighers on a godly pedastal like they do. Why don't these people see my favorite fighter as an immortal god that will run through every fighter in history of boxing?
"It must be race related", "it must be nationality related", "it must be because he's not slick", "it must be.........". Now I am generalizing. You have your share of Stax on Decks and his 20 alts. But you have the same from the other side. I'm not into internet beefs but we all know who those people are.
Next point is.....
But how can you defend a scumbag like Adrien Broner but not a gentleman and decent citizen like GGG?
The threads criticizing GGG are boxing related
The threads about Broner are about who he's ****ing, his latest rap video, what he's eating, his criminal record, his dad's weight, his girlfriend, his relationship with Floyd Mayweather.
See the difference? Boxing criticisms versus TMZ related fanboy bull**** criticisms. Where are the breakdowns of the flaws in Broner's game? None because the people that post in Broner related threads either don't have the ability to analyze his game or would just rather troll to get a rise out of "hood ****".
Those TMZ threads are fun but when it becomes 100% TMZ and 0% boxing...there is something wrong.
2. The threads criticizing GGG have been talking about his skills. His inability to fight off his back foot, his loading up on every shot and the types of fighters that they predict he will struggle with. ALL BOXING RELATED "SKILLS" DISCUSSIONS"
Yet...95% of people making these criticisms have admitted that he beats EVERY SINGLE MW IN THE WORLD RIGHT NOW, except maybe Sergio Martinez.
But that's hating, because he is not being ****ridden and put on a godly pedastal like his obsessed fanboys. Which tells me this:
Some people possess the ability to discuss this sport intelligently. They can identify flaws in a fighters style, they can breakdown style clashes and matchups and make informed educated judgements on certain fighters. Do they have a bias in the types of styles they prefer, I'm sure they do. But as long as its intelligent boxing discussion, who cares?
Others, don't know enough about the sport itself and don't have the ability to counter these arguments constructively criticizing their favorite fighters style and possible *****s in his armor. Since they don't have the ability to discuss boxing intelligently, they make excuses as to why not everybody puts their favorite fighers on a godly pedastal like they do. Why don't these people see my favorite fighter as an immortal god that will run through every fighter in history of boxing?
"It must be race related", "it must be nationality related", "it must be because he's not slick", "it must be.........". Now I am generalizing. You have your share of Stax on Decks and his 20 alts. But you have the same from the other side. I'm not into internet beefs but we all know who those people are.
Next point is.....
But how can you defend a scumbag like Adrien Broner but not a gentleman and decent citizen like GGG?
The threads criticizing GGG are boxing related
The threads about Broner are about who he's ****ing, his latest rap video, what he's eating, his criminal record, his dad's weight, his girlfriend, his relationship with Floyd Mayweather.
See the difference? Boxing criticisms versus TMZ related fanboy bull**** criticisms. Where are the breakdowns of the flaws in Broner's game? None because the people that post in Broner related threads either don't have the ability to analyze his game or would just rather troll to get a rise out of "hood ****".
Those TMZ threads are fun but when it becomes 100% TMZ and 0% boxing...there is something wrong.
Comment