Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Zahir Raheem Stops Tim Coleman in Two Rounds

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    Originally posted by HeroBando View Post
    You're an idiot. Morales was in sorry shape for Raheem, use your eyes. Pac had a score settle with an ATG. If Raheem could have stayed relevant for 1 more fight, maybe he could have gotten his beatdown. But he put in ATG shameful effort on HBO vs Freitas. And is the definition of a flash in the pan, never even won a paper belt.
    So let me get this straight Pacquiao didn't fight him because he lost to Freitas.

    Are you serious your defending Pacquiao ducking Zahir, by bringing up the other guy he ducked at that weight. Why didn't he just fight Freitas?

    And don't get me started on how muc bull**** his fight with David Diaz was.

    Comment


    • #22
      Originally posted by MakeItRain View Post
      What did the great Zahir Raheem do after he beat Erik Morales? Never heard of him after that.
      What did the great Erik Morales do after he schooled Pac? Has he won one meaningful fight since?

      Comment


      • #23
        Not pacquiao not bob arum but legendary matchmaker bruce trampler thats who im tired of lying a$$ bob and humble a$$ pacman getting the blame when its the top rank match maker who makes the matches

        Comment


        • #24
          Originally posted by Det. Conan View Post
          ducked? how can he ducked that kind of b level fighter w/ no fan based? infact there's no demand for the fight then.
          yeah he defeated morales in less entertaining bout. but who didnt beat morales back then? it doesnt mean that A defeated B and C defeated B, then A should fight C right away, if thats your case so Kentucky Floyd Chicken ducked pacman right? because they both defeated dela hoya, cotto, hatton, mosley & marquez.
          Top ranks matchmakers if you noticed dont let pacman fight certain styles tim bradley and mosley had shades of succes with that particular style but its not their normal style for the most part morales used that style to win rather easily when he beat pacman and why cant you people on this site use logic and stop acting like school girls with crushes on certain fighters its cool to like a particular style but sometimes you guys are blind to the facts or your just trolling idk but its kinda sickening how every thread somehow mayweathers in it or pacmans in it or this new guy everybody two weight classes below is ducking its boxing its a business the powers that be are in it to make long term investment not match their guy up with fighters he can loose to its called hype why cant you people understand it pacmans labeled as a one punch knock out artist when hes been one punched ko'd more times than he has done it he only kod hatton who ran face first into the punch then when marquez knocks pacman out he was on peds he stepped on pacs foot lol its ridiculous all the excuses made i like the guy but his hype made him mythical hes good fighter he gets the job done but he should he has all the advantages which he earned by kicking a$$ along the way but he did refuse to sign a contract because of testing on more than one occasion he said in an interview he was willing but he didnt sign a contract thats a fact mayweather agreed to all of pacs demands and had only one but but but lol see where im going with this media hype fanboys and racism can make people twist facts and its like some people believe anything the blind does truly lead the blind its sad that a sport can do this to grown men and women

          Comment


          • #25
            Hahahaha... hypocrites. They can dish it but they can't take it.

            Comment


            • #26
              Originally posted by boxingfeind View Post
              Was their a demand for Pacquiao to fight Oscar Larios or Jorge Solis?But Pacquiao fought them any way and made one of them come up 2 weight classes.Morales schooled Pedquiao right before Morales lost to Raheem,and Raheem fought Morales at a weight that was healthy for Morales.Pacquiao chose to fight Morales again by making him come down to 130, which was a weight Morales could not make with out draining himself.And Pedquiao destroyed a weight drained Morales.Then Pacquiao just acted like Raheem didn`t even exist by straight ducking him.
              I admit, Larios is a tune up fight that's why its only held in the Phils. but solis was not, he is a big threat that time. 2nd, did you realized that pac was not yet polished & improved and fought in 1 eye during fight w/ morales but he lost by narrow decision. Imagine if he has two working eyes back then. Drained? nope! a fight w/ raheem was supposed to be his tune up fight, he is just testing the water. 1st time in the lightweight then he realized that he is not yet belong to 135lber so he goes back to super feather w/ a back2back lost w/ pacman. the he lost again in the lightweight w/ diaz. meaning, he was already shot then,

              Comment


              • #27
                Originally posted by Cuban Linx View Post
                Sarcasm? lol...

                Pacquiao would have gained much more respect amongst the hardcore fans if he manned up and fought Raheem. There was time to fight Morales. He could have fought Morales AFTER he fought Raheem. I understand from a financial standpoint it probably wasn't the wisest move, but a duck is a duck.

                Whether he beats Raheem who knows. Morales failed because he tried to box with him and got picked apart.
                If that's the logic, Floyd must fight margarito & wlilliam to get respect isnt?

                Comment


                • #28
                  Originally posted by ShoulderRoll View Post
                  Is this the same guy that Pacquiao ducked? Asians suck.
                  Damn.....That is pretty racist their buddy!

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X
                  TOP