Case for what, for proving the he's clean? Someone has to force him to do it? This is laughable. He has said for years that he is an advocate of extra testing, years! A real "advocate" would sign up voluntarily like Donaire did. Yet not only has he not done that but he has to refused when publicly called out. Edwin called his bluff plain and simple, even said he'd pay for it
You're arguing the wrong thing, obviously he's not "guilty" of juicing because he's never failed a test but he is avoiding testing that will best determine if he's guilty of not. The question is why is he refusing to take the the test that he has advocated for years and is free of charge and will prove he's clean?
People have to force him to take it by dropping him off their network, or dropping out of a fight? This is ridiculous, how can you defend this?
But nobody wants to do **** about it and would rather ***** and complain as usual. Until somebody does something proactive, he's clean until proven otherwise.
The most proactive and easiest thing is Ward taking the test. Listen to yourself, other people have to do things like boycott, drop out of fights, or ban him to "force" him to take the tests when Ward can simply take the tests?
You're arguing the wrong thing, obviously he's not "guilty" of juicing because he's never failed a test but he is avoiding testing that will best determine if he's guilty of not. The question is why is he refusing to take the the test that he has advocated for years and is free of charge and will prove he's clean?
People have to force him to take it by dropping him off their network, or dropping out of a fight? This is ridiculous, how can you defend this?
But nobody wants to do **** about it and would rather ***** and complain as usual. Until somebody does something proactive, he's clean until proven otherwise.
Comment