Obviously Bradley, the people that will tell you otherwise probably discount all the leather Paulie landed just because he cant punch...
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Better defense: Broner or Bradley?
Collapse
-
-
-
Originally posted by SoggyLungs View Postbroner...bradley has been hit flush several times with power punches (i.e. against pac and most definitely against provo)
Comment
-
I'd go with Broner as the better defensive fighter. He can stand in front of you and still pretty difficult to hit clean.
Bradley's footwork is better which allows him to move out of danger, but his actual defense is far from watertight.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Rome-By-Ko View PostActually Bradley has been very hard to hit over his career..The prov fight removed,nobody has landed much on Bradley..
Originally posted by Rome-By-Ko View PostYou may need to watch the Pac fight again..Pac barely touch Bradley all fight..253 punches landed,if you believe that I have a bridge in Manhattan I wanna sell you..
Last edited by Light_Speed; 10-29-2013, 03:40 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Light_Speed View Post
Oh yea outside of the first and last rd of the Holt fight,Holt did not win another rd..I show a gif of Mayweather getting hit over three times by Cotto..Does this mean Mayweather is easy to hit??Your Pac gifs are all within the first 4 rds..LOL..
Comment
-
Originally posted by Rome-By-Ko View PostWow four punches..That proves your point..
Oh yea outside of the first and last rd of the Holt fight,Holt did not win another rd..I show a gif of Mayweather getting hit over three times by Cotto..Does this mean Mayweather is easy to hit??Your Pac gifs are all within the first 4 rds..LOL..
Bradley got dropped twice by Holt, you said outside of the Ruslan fight Bradley has always been hard to hit but it's not true.
Comment
-
I don't know, I think Broner's defense at close quarters is better while Bradley's is better from mid to long range.
Comment
Comment