Obviously Bradley, the people that will tell you otherwise probably discount all the leather Paulie landed just because he cant punch...
Better defense: Broner or Bradley?
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
You may need to watch the Pac fight again..Pac barely touch Bradley all fight..253 punches landed,if you believe that I have a bridge in Manhattan I wanna sell you..Comment
-
I'd go with Broner as the better defensive fighter. He can stand in front of you and still pretty difficult to hit clean.
Bradley's footwork is better which allows him to move out of danger, but his actual defense is far from watertight.Comment
-
-
Wow four punches..That proves your point..
Oh yea outside of the first and last rd of the Holt fight,Holt did not win another rd..I show a gif of Mayweather getting hit over three times by Cotto..Does this mean Mayweather is easy to hit??Your Pac gifs are all within the first 4 rds..LOL..Comment
-
If someone got "barely touched all fight" as you said then people wouldn't be able to make those gifs.Wow four punches..That proves your point..
Oh yea outside of the first and last rd of the Holt fight,Holt did not win another rd..I show a gif of Mayweather getting hit over three times by Cotto..Does this mean Mayweather is easy to hit??Your Pac gifs are all within the first 4 rds..LOL..
Bradley got dropped twice by Holt, you said outside of the Ruslan fight Bradley has always been hard to hit but it's not true.Comment
-
I don't know, I think Broner's defense at close quarters is better while Bradley's is better from mid to long range.Comment



Comment