Dwyer: Bradley should retire now, not ruin legacy like Roy Jones

[johnm is...]

Yeah that had me disgusted. While he'll sometimes make ridiculous statements, I tend to never skip his videos because he actually breaks down styles. Really liked his Broner-Maidana breakdown, pretty much coincided with how I see it going as well.

One of my favorite boxing heads on Youtube is Beeb, he doesn't upload much though. He's on ThaBoxingVoice though.

I check out a lot of guys videos. Dwyer included. I also listen to a lot of podcasts when I have the chance. Reason being, I bet on a lot of fights. Nearly every weekend. And I like getting different opinions. Plenty of times people have caught something that I might have missed.

To ask for money to view a youtube video is ******, and egotistical. More times than not, I know what Dwyer is betting, before Dwyer knows what Dwyer is betting. Lately, to say that the guy is predictable would be an understatement. And I can't stand listening to 15 minutes of craziness to get to the 5 minutes I actually want to hear (I think it was the Fonfara/Campillo video where he talked about SRL, and Hagler or something like that, lol. Just made no sense). Usually just skip to the end.

[Weebler I]

And? Marquez win over Pacquiao is better than any win of Mayweather's win, but why is Mayweather's resume considered greater than Marquez's? Because Mayweather's resume has more depth. Marquez is actually a good example to use because the biggest slight against his resume is a lack of depth, which is the boat Bradley falls into right now.

At the moment he has a good resume, but collecting wins against other top fighters, even if they're beneath Marquez and Pacquiao, can push it into the great territory.

Dwyer is really talking about head to head the best of the era, as opposed to depth of resume.

I.e. Mayweather is considered greater than Marquez because he beat him. Bradley's claim as best being the wins over Marquez and Pacquiao.

E.g. Froch could beat every SMW and LHW out there, but he'll always be considered inferior to Ward because he lost to him (and Kessler who lost to Ward).

[Doctor_Tenma]

I check out a lot of guys videos. Dwyer included. I also listen to a lot of podcasts when I have the chance. Reason being, I bet on a lot of fights. Nearly every weekend. And I like getting different opinions. Plenty of times people have caught something that I might have missed.

To ask for money to view a youtube video is ******, and egotistical. More times than not, I know what Dwyer is betting, before Dwyer knows what Dwyer is betting. Lately, to say that the guy is predictable would be an understatement. And I can't stand listening to 15 minutes of craziness to get to the 5 minutes I actually want to hear (I think it was the Fonfara/Campillo video where he talked about SRL, and Hagler or something like that, lol. Just made no sense). Usually just skip to the end.

I feel you there

[Grimgash]

Dwyer is really talking about head to head the best of the era, as opposed to depth of resume.

I.e. Mayweather is considered greater than Marquez because he beat him. Bradley's claim as best being the wins over Marquez and Pacquiao.

E.g. Froch could beat every SMW and LHW out there, but he'll always be considered inferior to Ward because he lost to him (and Kessler who lost to Ward).

While true, also his resume removing marquez still has a ton more depth...and he's accomplished more. Not everyone who lost to someone is considered better. At the moment Pac is still greater than Bradley and Marquez. Granted Pac beat marquez a few times. Bradley has no stand out skills that make him mentioned as the best of the era...so he needs resume depth to back it up.

I'm not knocking Bradleys resume...it's good...but it's not on par with Pac or Mayweather. If he wants to be considered one of the best he has to either out work them resume wise or at the very least keep winning long after they're gone. Neither can be done retiring.

Sure he "can" lose to anyone on any given night, but who would be favored to beat him at the moment? Pac in a rematch....Mayweather...Otherwise just keep on training like a beast and winning matches will get him his respect.

[JDezi4]

Are you kidding me?

He can cross his fingers Rios KO's Pac so he doesn't have to fight Pac again, and can just outbox Rios with ease... Rematch Provo... Maybe fight Alvarado just becuz

Then his contract with Top Rank will end, and he can fight Broner, Guerrero, Rios, etc from Golden Boy...

Stay away from Floyd and Pac, and we have ourselves the front runner for next p4p #1 fighter

Why would he retire now? He's like 30

Dwyer's a dumbass

[hugh grant]

RJJ actually won some fights. Bradley unarguably lost one, and arguably won 2 in his last 3 fights.

I think Bradley needs to actually win a few fights before calling it a day. Against Floyd for starters.

[tibbar]

This is something ******, the guy is just getting there why quit now? You go into prizefighting your primary goal is to get the top $$$$ as much as you can legacy will come after. There are so many in bradleys level he can fight he should take all opportunities, rematch pacquiao, provo fights will surely give him top ppv $$$. Strike while the iron is hot!

[RichCCFC]

Dwyer talks some rubbish

[CubanGuyNYC]

What the hell is Dwyer talking about? Bradley's just now making good money. He's young and he's not taking a beating. What's Tim gonna do if he retires now? Write children's books?

[.Mexico.]

Legacy? what Legacy! 3 robberies is a legacy now? WOW