Tim Bradley: 32 have tried 32 have failed

[QuebecSTAR2]

Stop typing with Timothy's 12" penis and make sure to clean it well
but not with your mouth before giving him back.

[mathed]

"All Tim Bradley does is win" - Roy Jones Junior

"Keep betting against me and I'll keep taking your money" - Timothy Desert Storm Bradley

[QuebecSTAR2]

"Keep betting against me and I'll keep STEALING your money" - Timothy The THIEF Bradley[/QUOTE]

[HeroBando]

Listen,why you wanna continue to argue Bradley win over Pac is beyond me..All Pac had to do was fight the rematch..He choose not too,that's on him bro,Bradley holds a victory over Pac..One I agree with the judges he's earned,trying to throw salt on this is just a bit of sour g****s imo..

Until Pac comes to fight Bradley to try and write the ship,Bradley owns a piece of his azz..Nuff said..

Well if you wanna go there, Tim did pass on a career high 6m for the rematch. Yeah I know he had better options, less lucrative doe. Hey so did Pac, more lucrative doe, and riskier.

[Derranged]

Bradley is going to beat Pac again soon enough..Then the excuse will be that the judges robbed Pac twice..I think most want to go on this robbery bull**** cause they know Bradley does not KO his opponents..He does however outbox them..

I remember when he beat Abregu,how many were saying he did it and not impressively..LMAO dude shut his opponent out yet it was not impressive..Now I here he beat Marquez,yet not impressively..He clearly beat Marquez,and tbh there should not be any doubt..Yet that was not impressive as well..

This however is,the only fighter to say they defeated two atg hof..On top of an already impressive resume=Bradley a first ballot HOF..Also a great fighter in his on right..Deal with it haters..

At "beat Pac again soon enough" and "I think most want to go on this robbery bull**** cause they know Bradley does not KO his opponents."

Wrong. 1. Pac was robbed in the first fight. 2. Most think the fight was a robbery because they believe Pac won more rounds, which he clearly did. Bradley got a gift.

[Vasyl’s dad]

Quote:

Originally Posted by HeroBando

It doesn't matter whether it was a beatdown, you can even win and get beat down like Bradley vs Ruslan. You can definitely make it a closer fight than Tim managed vs Pac on most cards, while getting beat down. Or you can get shut out while not taking much damage.

Rios might have said it once and got plenty of ****, rightfully. But he doesn't go around saying it all the time, that'd be annoying as hell.

Listen,why you wanna continue to argue Bradley win over Pac is beyond me..All Pac had to do was fight the rematch..He choose not too,that's on him bro,Bradley holds a victory over Pac..One I agree with the judges he's earned,trying to throw salt on this is just a bit of sour g****s imo..

Until Pac comes to fight Bradley to try and write the ship,Bradley owns a piece of his azz..Nuff said..

Parnell Whitaker could never beat Chavez.


Posted from Boxingscene.com App for Android

[Rome-By-Ko]

Well if you wanna go there, Tim did pass on a career high 6m for the rematch. Yeah I know he had better options, less lucrative doe. Hey so did Pac, more lucrative doe, and riskier.

Ok so they both passed on the rematch..Pac passed first doe,and his people sound like they might wanna pass again..

[Rome-By-Ko]

At "beat Pac again soon enough" and "I think most want to go on this robbery bull**** cause they know Bradley does not KO his opponents."

Wrong. 1. Pac was robbed in the first fight. 2. Most think the fight was a robbery because they believe Pac won more rounds, which he clearly did. Bradley got a gift.

Parnell Whitaker could never beat Chavez.


Posted from Boxingscene.com App for Android

This is your opinion,I don't agree..I really don't get what the highlighted has to do with Pac Bradley..

[L3TH4L]

That depends entirely on the judges, and whether he makes the mistake of giving Pacquiao a rematch. Whichever comes first.

[Vasyl’s dad]

Quote:

Originally Posted by Derranged

At "beat Pac again soon enough" and "I think most want to go on this robbery bull**** cause they know Bradley does not KO his opponents."

Wrong. 1. Pac was robbed in the first fight. 2. Most think the fight was a robbery because they believe Pac won more rounds, which he clearly did. Bradley got a gift.

Quote:

Originally Posted by CatchweightKing

Parnell Whitaker could never beat Chavez.


Posted from Boxingscene.com App for Android

This is your opinion,I don't agree..I really don't get what the highlighted has to do with Pac Bradley..

it's not an opinion, it's a fact.


Posted from Boxingscene.com App for Android