Before Canelo faced Floyd the Ring had him at p4p#9

**bojangles1987** · 10-15-2013, 08:13 AM

He never should have been p4p ranked to begin with. The Ring is ridiculous.

**techliam** · 10-15-2013, 08:17 AM

The RING has no lustre anymore. Still a pretty belt...but so is the WBC belt.

A lot of highly regarded boxing analysts and writers grouped up to form the TBRB, which you can access here:

http://www.tbrb.org/

Makes your arguments much more legit if you base them on those rankings (given hardly anyone disagrees with the majority of these rankings), rather than GBP-owned The RING.

As time of writing this, they have yet to add the result of Bradley-Marquez

**OJ Simpson** · 10-15-2013, 08:23 AM

RING is owned by GB. The RING P4P ratings are Chuck Giampa's list. People who don't belong there are frequently on there.

**Russian Crushin** · 10-15-2013, 08:25 AM

That's called overhype

Guys like mares and Danny and froch have way better wins yet never made the list

**SnakeVen0m** · 10-15-2013, 08:28 AM

The Ring P4P list is nothing but a tool to promote and hype up fights. It's not a list you should take serious. They lost their credibility long ago.

**CraigM** · 10-15-2013, 08:30 AM

****** rankings aside, i wouldnt put a beating by Mayweather as a p4p reducing loss.

I mean Canelo did better than Marquez who is still one of the best.

**New England** · 10-15-2013, 08:34 AM

the ring is owned by goldenboy promotions. have we not gone over this?

the ring is owned by goldenboy promotions.

**New England** · 10-15-2013, 08:35 AM

Originally posted by CraigM

****** rankings aside, i wouldnt put a beating by Mayweather as a p4p reducing loss.

I mean Canelo did better than Marquez who is still one of the best.

marquez was a featherweight and lightweight for the prime of his career. alvarez is probably ghoing to finish his career at mw.

**KeepItObjective** · 10-15-2013, 09:10 AM

Get your ****ing nose out of Floyd's bootypipe you loser.

Before Canelo faced Floyd the Ring had him at p4p#9