Judging should be the same for all fights!!!

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • boxfan1983
    Banned
    • Jul 2012
    • 185
    • 5
    • 0
    • 299

    #1

    Judging should be the same for all fights!!!

    Ok, explain to me why Broner gets jabbed to death by Paulie but he wins because of power punching but Bradley jabs Marquez to death and it was a schooling? I dont see how someone is schooled when he landed 30 more power shots, if that is the case Bradley fans which I am sure are Broner fans also need to explain to me what taking someone to school is. Id love to hear your explanation as to why Broner beat Paulie and why Bradley schooled Marquez.
  • Sugar Adam Ali
    Undisputed Champion
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Apr 2013
    • 27630
    • 970
    • 1,174
    • 82,827

    #2
    Each fight is different,,, you cant have a cookie-cutter way to judge fights because there is so many variables,,

    pauli outjabbed broner but broner down the stretch was landing the harder more telling shots,,,

    in bradley-jmm,, bradley was doing alot of jabbing but also landed some hard shots, as did jmm,, but jmm didnt land with the consistency that broner did,,

    Comment

    • Derranged
      Banned
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Oct 2005
      • 46593
      • 2,126
      • 1,350
      • 162,628

      #3
      You can't rely on compubox.

      Comment

      • dynomyte1444
        Interim Champion
        • Aug 2006
        • 941
        • 39
        • 72
        • 7,260

        #4
        You are right judging should be the same but you have to know how to score.

        Paulie did will. He won some of the rounds but his punches were very light. Broner was landing the crisp hard shots and controlled the fight.

        In bradley vs JMM you had Bradley controlling the fight with his jab and was making JMM miss alot. While JMM was in the fight, he just never took control and could never land crisp punches like broner. Tim was rolling with them or dodging them out right

        Comment

        • dynomyte1444
          Interim Champion
          • Aug 2006
          • 941
          • 39
          • 72
          • 7,260

          #5
          Originally posted by Derranged
          You can't rely on compubox.
          THis. Compubox is not the way to judge a fight at all

          Comment

          • boxfan1983
            Banned
            • Jul 2012
            • 185
            • 5
            • 0
            • 299

            #6
            Originally posted by Sugar Adam Ali
            Each fight is different,,, you cant have a cookie-cutter way to judge fights because there is so many variables,,

            pauli outjabbed broner but broner down the stretch was landing the harder more telling shots,,,

            in bradley-jmm,, bradley was doing alot of jabbing but also landed some hard shots, as did jmm,, but jmm didnt land with the consistency that broner did,,
            I gave Marquez the last 3rds as did most people, Marquez agressed and did a fairly good job at it.There was no difference really in either fight.

            Comment

            • Sugar Adam Ali
              Undisputed Champion
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Apr 2013
              • 27630
              • 970
              • 1,174
              • 82,827

              #7
              Originally posted by boxfan1983
              I gave Marquez the last 3rds as did most people, Marquez agressed and did a fairly good job at it.There was no difference really in either fight.
              i agree that jmm took the last 3, but the majority of the fight bradley controlled with his jab,,,
              Pauli jabbed broner, but after a few rounds couldnt keep broner from walking him down and landing power shots,,,, broner landed hard shots on pauli for more rounds then jmm did to bradley,,

              both fights were close,, i actually gave jmm the last 4 rounds and had it a draw, but bradley won fair and square, i cant complain or say it was a robbery

              pauli put up a good fight, but i had him losing 115-113 to broner,,, both close but broner did more than jmm, and pauli didnt do more than bradley

              Comment

              • dynomyte1444
                Interim Champion
                • Aug 2006
                • 941
                • 39
                • 72
                • 7,260

                #8
                Originally posted by boxfan1983
                I gave Marquez the last 3rds as did most people, Marquez agressed and did a fairly good job at it.There was no difference really in either fight.
                There was a huge difference. I think you might have to pay attention more to detail

                Not trying to be a **** but those fights were not the same even if you felt they had the same flow

                Comment

                • New England
                  Strong champion.
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Oct 2010
                  • 37514
                  • 1,926
                  • 1,486
                  • 97,173

                  #9
                  watch amateur boxing.

                  Comment

                  • johnm is...
                    ****in *** Broads
                    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                    • Oct 2005
                    • 10700
                    • 820
                    • 1,382
                    • 48,813

                    #10
                    Originally posted by boxfan1983
                    I gave Marquez the last 3rds as did most people, Marquez agressed and did a fairly good job at it.There was no difference really in either fight.
                    You can't be serious.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP