Comments Thread For: Nacho: No Rematch Needed, Bradley Does Not Sell!
Collapse
-
What did I miss,was someone really talking rematch??I mean Marquez loss clearly..I'm very confused by this thread..Comment
-
Bradley beat Marquez fair and square.
Bradley got a gift against Pacquaio and most of boxing world agrees, I just can't see how anyone would have Bradley winning 7 rounds.Comment
-
Let me get this straight. JMM claims robbery, but don't want a rematch because there is no money against Bradley, yet he avoided a much much bigger payday against Pac because he wanted to keep those warm fuzzies? So is it the title, the money, or the fuzzies he wants more?????Comment
-
lol yeah it was pretty boring
JMM should hang em upComment
-
Bye
Go home Nacho, and take you whipped,whining fighter with you. When you two guys come back, it will be to a diminished venue.Comment
-
Lets say that it was 30 seconds. It was a stronger 30 seconds than what Bradley did against Manny. Bradley didn't do much more and in fact did way less than Manny yet I gave Bradley credit for the win against Marquez. You need to be consistent budd.
As for fighting just 30 seconds, Manny usually fights for close to the full 3 minutes and the Bradley fight was the exception for the simple reason in that they believed that they won the round with that alone. Not good logic but that is what happened.
BUT
when Floyd just moves around the ring and fights for a total of 20-40 seconds a round (which happens often), Floyd's fans all of a sudden change their mind and say it's the quality of the punches that count even though the punches are weaker than what Manny did against Bradley. Like I said, stay consistent!Last edited by ADP02; 10-14-2013, 01:48 PM.Comment
-
.
Comment