Are european fighters dong better because

**Poet682006** · 10-14-2013, 03:16 AM

Originally posted by Sam Donald

theyre staying amateur longer?

Looking at guys like GGG, Kovalev, Gradovich

They werent your common debutants at 18 or 19 years old

They turned pro 23 and older and have made a great impact

Also, lomochenko who is just an exceptional talent has just turned 25. But hes just on another level anyway

Do u think USA N UK fighters will benefit if they turned pro at 23/24 years old rather than at 18/19?

Dong better? Why do you want to know about their dongs? :gay:

**Yakushev** · 10-14-2013, 04:08 AM

Originally posted by Sam Donald

theyre staying amateur longer?

Looking at guys like GGG, Kovalev, Gradovich

They werent your common debutants at 18 or 19 years old

They turned pro 23 and older and have made a great impact

Also, lomochenko who is just an exceptional talent has just turned 25. But hes just on another level anyway

Do u think USA N UK fighters will benefit if they turned pro at 23/24 years old rather than at 18/19?

Please! Stop this ****** topic! Russia Ukraine Belarussia Kazakhstan and other former soviet countries is not European boxing school, It's Soviet boxing school. They are very unlike to any other European countries (England German France etc.) Soviet boxing school has radically different style, philosophy, training methods etc. It has a lot in common with Cuban boxing school.

**Jloro** · 10-14-2013, 04:16 AM

Haha I don't think turning pro that early is good for everyone

**D-MiZe** · 10-14-2013, 04:53 AM

UK ain't European.

**Sam Donald** · 10-14-2013, 10:50 AM

bump...............

**4Corners** · 10-14-2013, 10:52 AM

Call me crazy, but I wasn't all that impressed with Lomachenko. He looked pretty good, but no way would I pick him over Rigondeaux.

**Sam Donald** · 10-14-2013, 02:07 PM

^^^^^^^^ bro..it was his debut and he beat a solid fighter

Are european fighters dong better because