real talk, Bradley's resume is better than Mayweather's at age 30

[daggum]

Who's Gerena?

a bum who fought literally no one until he fought floyd. that's a good win according to floyd fans..........just like he put sosa as a notable win. when you don't have much you have to go into fantasy boxing pretend mode.

[-Kev-]

You are the ****** one as you apparently can't read. We're talking about who had the better resume AT AGE 30, not all time obviously dumbass

Okay I saw that, but he goes on to mention Bradley's "deep" resume and leaves out these guys:

Chavez
Baldomir
Judah
Gerena
Gatti
Sosa
Corley

[daggum]

hey guys you forgot justin juuko for floyd!

[-Kev-]

a bum who fought literally no one until he fought floyd. that's a good win according to floyd fans..........just like he put sosa as a notable win. when you don't have much you have to go into fantasy boxing pretend mode.

But he mentioned Provodnikov and Cherry, who hadn't beaten any one of note before fighting Bradley, but it's okay right?

He mentioned Abregu who hadn't fought any one before Bradley but that's okay too?

Okay.

[daggum]

Okay I saw that, but he goes on to mention Bradley's "deep" resume and leaves out these guys:

Chavez
Baldomir
Judah
Gerena
Gatti
Sosa
Corley

why do you keep mentioning a bum? mentioning bums just shows how light floyd's resume is and makes him look bad. then again it is the truth so thanks for being honest.

[LBJ2010]

Not really because he didn't beat Pac and Holt and Peterson are tough but overrated by the self proclaimed "hardcore" fans on this site.

I rate his W over Marquez quite highly, but still, Marquez is 40 years old.

And you most certainly could say he ducked Khan even if it was to pursue greater things.

He fights Pacquiao and Marquez yet ducked Khan?

also bradley easily fights guys more in their prime. He flat out domianted Alexander and Peterson when they were both undefeated and viewed as the top guys at 140. Holt was top 3 as well. while Floyd's best wins are an old Oscar, shot Hernandez, and he lossed to Castillo

[-Kev-]

He mentions Casamayor but leaves out Vazquez.

Every body is so keen on basing Floyd's resume that they don't even ask OP why would he mention Casamayor, Abregu, Cherry but leave out Vazquez.

That's pretty funny how every one is just focused on Floyd, who has a solid enough 130 resume to be considered a top 3 SFW of all time.

[Carpe Diem]

Another typical "King of the week" thread after a fighter comes off a good win.

[daggum]

But he mentioned Provodnikov and Cherry, who hadn't beaten any one of note before fighting Bradley, but it's okay right?

He mentioned Abregu who hadn't fought any one before Bradley but that's okay too?

Okay.

jesus chavez and carlos hernandez didn't do anything before floyd fought them. even corrales' resume was pretty trash. chavez and hernandez were hand picked face first mexi-brawlers. they only accomplished things after floyd fought them. floyd is lucky that they did something and the didn't turn into 2 more gerenas, juukos, sosas, bruseles, etc...also prov beat bradley so maybe that's why he mentions him? flooring bradley 4 times is pretty impressive.

[-Kev-]

why do you keep mentioning a bum? mentioning bums just shows how light floyd's resume is and makes him look bad. then again it is the truth so thanks for being honest.

Gerena was not a "bum", he lost to the best. He was a B- fighter. He was also a big SFW. He lost to Floyd, Hernandez, Chavez, Salido.