58 to 6 in vites for bradley beating juan

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Jc8804
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Mar 2013
    • 6231
    • 394
    • 143
    • 30,652

    #1

    58 to 6 in vites for bradley beating juan

    Cut it out .
    6
    People with a whine for juan .
    Get over it ,juan lost clearly .

    More people voted for draw (8)
    Then juan won(6)

    58 for timmy spanking that arce with ease(58 people)

    Im focusing on alvarado vs provo and manny vs rios . Both good fights with a bunch of b level fighters
  • Hougigo
    Gossip Girl
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Sep 2011
    • 38755
    • 730
    • 236
    • 47,223

    #2
    Waiting for that guy that dues the fight score cards... usually good insight there

    Comment

    • JAMES_THUNDER
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Jan 2013
      • 1164
      • 74
      • 47
      • 9,482

      #3
      tim did win imo but lost to pac even clearer.

      Comment

      • Jc8804
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Mar 2013
        • 6231
        • 394
        • 143
        • 30,652

        #4
        Its 6 posters crying about something over 80 percent think
        Otherwise including all media outlets

        Comment

        • TX_BOXNG
          Undisputed Champion
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Jan 2010
          • 5515
          • 237
          • 26
          • 28,695

          #5
          8-4 or 7-5, Bradley the clear winner

          Comment

          • Bushidō
            GGG-Unit
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Jul 2009
            • 6184
            • 131
            • 46
            • 13,003

            #6
            I don't agree with Ledermans card but I thought some of the early rounds were really close.

            For me though, Bradley clearly won a close fight (if that makes sense)

            Comment

            Working...
            TOP