Comments Thread For: Tim Bradley Compares Marquez and Pacquiao Battles

[MDPopescu]

who's this poster who said Bradley was not fighting back? gotta throw this gif to his face if I can he he he

The fact that Bradley is an talented, valliant, and intelligent fighter is not the issue here... The issue is that he did not beat Manny. (And I'm not one of Manny's fans.)

[checko12]

The fact that Bradley is an talented, valliant, and intelligent fighter is not the issue here... The issue is that he did not beat Manny. (And I'm not one of Manny's fans.)

so true. How he even talks about beating Manny is a complete joke.

[mrjoeblive]

[/b]

THIS

Watch the fight without lampley commentating (which I did when I saw the fight live, and everyone there -including the commentators- thought it was a close fight at the end that could go either way. Then, when I saw a you tube video with highlights of lampley commentating for that fight I LOLd at how biased it was but felt bad for timmy too cause I understood why everyone in the states thought pac shut him out).

I said a long time ago the hbo commentators ruin most fights with their bias comments. They call out all punches for their fav even the ones that were blocked. And ignore punches for the other guy. Plus I don't know what fights ledderman is watching. Like the floyd hatton fight he gave rick the 1st round. And some other fights where you have to scratch your head.

[mrjoeblive]

so true. How he even talks about beating Manny is a complete joke.

The fact is tim beat pac. His record shows zero defeats. And some had pac winning while others had tim winning. I thought pac was lazy in that fight. He tried to pull a SRL and steal rounds by fighting at the end of the round insted of the entire round. Imo

[HeroBando]

The fact is tim beat pac. His record shows zero defeats. And some had pac winning while others had tim winning. I thought pac was lazy in that fight. He tried to pull a SRL and steal rounds by fighting at the end of the round insted of the entire round. Imo

LOL at some. 121-1-1 on press scores. Some had Floyd losing to Cotto, more than 1 I think. A 5x higher percentage had JMM beating Bradley lol

[mrjoeblive]

Have you missed those ringside press scores? They were overwhelmingly for Pac. You figure those guys were made to listen to Lampley live at the arena?

Hero did you feel the same way about pac v jmm 3? The crowd ringside and the majority of the fight pundits had jmm winning that fight. But public opinion does not change the official fight record that says pac won that fight.

[HeroBando]

Hero did you feel the same way about pac v jmm 3? The crowd ringside and the majority of the fight pundits had jmm winning that fight. But public opinion does not change the official fight record that says pac won that fight.

Of course not, the ringside scores show the difference between a close fight and a rout:

"Among the unofficial scorers above, 57 scored the bout for Marquez, 51 scored the bout for Pacquiao, and the remaining 36 scored the bout a draw."

"Among the experts above, 121 scored the bout for Pacquiao, 1 scored the bout a draw, and 1 scored the bout for Bradley."

[mrjoeblive]

LOL at some. 121-1-1 on press scores. Some had Floyd losing to Cotto, more than 1 I think. A 5x higher percentage had JMM beating Bradley lol

Lol when I say some I am speaking about public opinion. And some had tim winning I gave the edge to tim because I thought tim out worked pac. And some did have floyd losing to cotto but check hooks dont count lol.

[mrjoeblive]

Of course not, the ringside scores show the difference between a close fight and a rout:

"Among the unofficial scorers above, 57 scored the bout for Marquez, 51 scored the bout for Pacquiao, and the remaining 36 scored the bout a draw."

"Among the experts above, 121 scored the bout for Pacquiao, 1 scored the bout a draw, and 1 scored the bout for Bradley."

Good post. I like when people base their stance on tangible information if I agree or not but you have to respect a logical post.

[HeroBando]

Good post. I like when people base their stance on tangible information if I agree or not but you have to respect a logical post.

Thanks man, this is my bread and butter lol