Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Nacho Rips Bradley: The only unbeaten boxer with 2 losses

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • wrong board

    Originally posted by T18Z View Post
    Couldn't of said it better myself.
    u shall go to cruz vs salido board
    Last edited by awara; 10-13-2013, 09:49 PM.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by OJ Simpson View Post
      Eat a ****.
      u must be cruz fan

      Comment


      • I though Bradley won,but who am I to question GOD?

        Comment


        • Originally posted by bojangles1987 View Post
          Nacho was the same way in Pacquiao-Marquez 3. "You're winning, you got it, you're winning!"

          Tell your fighter to close strong. If Marquez closes strong he probably gets the decision.
          the problem is JMM can't do that, everytime he tries to close strong is when he gets hurt or knocked down, he can't fight going forward he is only comfortable off the back foot. Bradley almost knocked him on his ass in the last round when JMM tried to press him with combos, most of the time when jmm gets hurt or dropped is from him trying to be aggressive.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by HeroBando View Post
            Good job man. I think their last fights really swung people's opinion on this. Bradley showed uncharacteristic "weakness" vs Ruslan and it was fair to think that fight took something out of him. Team Marquez probably thought so
            Thanks bando i appriciate that!!

            Comment


            • This is already getting old.

              Comment


              • BRAD definitely WON, but the Provo Beating Showed.....
                I think he should follow the Pretty Boy's Formula,
                and AVOID all Left Handed Power Punchers!!!

                Comment


                • He lost 2 in a row before the JMM fight, I knew Bradley would come in motivated. He won the JMM fight in my opinion 7-5 or 8-4 tho. And I was rooting for JMM.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by drenlou View Post
                    Ruslan himself would disagree with you
                    I think when people say Ruslan they're referring to the two knockdowns that the referee missed, had those been called KD's, Provodnikov would of probably won on points. He did admit defeat though, the KD's weren't called, what can you do

                    As far as JMM-Bradley... I thought Bradley won clearly, without a doubt

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by King- View Post
                      I think when people say Ruslan they're referring to the two knockdowns that the referee missed, had those been called KD's, Provodnikov would of probably won on points. He did admit defeat though, the KD's weren't called, what can you do

                      As far as JMM-Bradley... I thought Bradley won clearly, without a doubt
                      That's how I see it. If the ref would have called those two knock downs I would have had Prov winning the fight by two points. Without the knock downs I had Bradley winning also by two points

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP