Does Timothy Bradley actually win any matches??

[Phenom]

you shouldnt score fights if you had him down 9 rounds to paquiao if you had him losing his last 3 fights you better off watching another sports that wont confuse you

[black.ink]

Thread starter clearly didn't watch the fight.

It wasn't a SD at all. It was a clear UD from Bradley. Marquez won 4 rounds, 5 at best if you're being generous.

If you want to believe the scorecards, and take it as an SD to suit your agenda then fine, but just remember in the same sentence you say Bradley was down by 9 rounds minimum in the Pac fight....yet the scorecards don't suggest this.

Why do scorecards matter in certain fights for you, but not in others?

If you think Marquez won the fight...log off, and go watch another sport. Dickhead.

[slimshandy69]

Yes he clearly won. Did you watch the fight or not??....How did you score the fight? It doesn't matter that one of the judges didn't see it that way. It was still only one winner in this fight and that man was Bradley. A well deserved victory where he was the slight underdog.

where did I say he los this last 3 matches, I said its debatable he won his last 3 matches, which has been shown by the judges.

My main point being his resume is hyper inflation and he shouldn't be a top ten p4p fighter

[slimshandy69]

Thread starter clearly didn't watch the fight.

It wasn't a SD at all. It was a clear UD from Bradley. Marquez won 4 rounds, 5 at best if you're being generous.

If you want to believe the scorecards, and take it as an SD to suit your agenda then fine, but just remember in the same sentence you say Bradley was down by 9 rounds minimum in the Pac fight....yet the scorecards don't suggest this.

Why do scorecards matter in certain fights for you, but not in others?

If you think Marquez won the fight...log off, and go watch another sport. Dickhead.

I actually predicted a timothy Bradley points win mate. No agenda from me. Plus I didn't say he lost. I say he vey rarely wins comfortably where he can legitimately say hes a p4p top ten.

[VatoMulatto]

where did I say he los this last 3 matches, I said its debatable he won his last 3 matches, which has been shown by the judges.

My main point being his resume is hyper inflation and he shouldn't be a top ten p4p fighter

Should we not give Floyd credit for taking Canelo to school because one of the judge scored it a draw?? Based on the scorecards it was a very tough fight that could've gone either way, right?

You don't have to think Bradley is a top ten P4P fighter....but I'm only talking about Bradley's most recent fight. No matter how one of the judge scored the fight, It was a clear UD from Bradley. Many people have JMM as number three on their P4P list so this is obviously a great victory for Bradley.

[hugh grant]

"fighter of the year"

wtf are people trolling. He was down 9 rounds minimum on the many pac match, it was bloomin debatable against the Russian and now he has a split decision over a near 40 year old.

Tha guy resume is hyper inflation, and he shouldn't be in the top ten p4p fighters as he has debatably lost his last 3 fights.

No, he gets favourable hometown decisions. He lost 10-2 to Pac.

[Furn]

I had Bradley winning 2 maybe 3 rounds tonight.

[LacedUp]

Thread starter clearly didn't watch the fight

// thread

[ddeg10]

Here we go again. Bradley dominated tonight. He made it look easy as another post mentioned. Yet here you guys are, giving him ZERO credit. He was brilliant tonight, he earned it and he needs recognition - he is easily top 10 p4p. Watch the Pacquiao fight again with the sound off. It was closer than I originally thought. I had it a blowout for Pac the first time, and when I watched it again I scored it a draw. After watching Bradley outwork Marquez easily, it made me think that maybe Pac will have his hands full against Rios.... Regardless, Bradley made it happen tonight, and Bradley deserves respect and recognition. He gets the job done no matter what.

[slimshandy69]

I had Bradley winning 2 maybe 3 rounds tonight.

elaborate mate.