When You Judge A Fight . . .

[MPX309]

Overall . . . U ask urself "Which boxer would I rather be?" . . . There's been some crazy decisions lately, but this is common sense surely, how are judges getting it so wrong lately?

[DoubleMM]

Overall . . . U ask urself "Which boxer would I rather be?" . . . There's been some crazy decisions lately, but this is common sense surely, how are judges getting it so wrong lately?

This wasn't wrong at all. Bradley was doing jack ****. He was running.

[LeG00N]

I hope you mean they got it wrong for Bradley, but Judging by your Sig i'll say your blind and went by Lederman's joke card

[MPX309]

I hope you mean they got it wrong for Bradley, but Judging by your Sig i'll say your blind and went by Lederman's joke card

What, no I meant the judge who scored it for Marquez got it wrong. . . btw I was supporting Marquez, but Bradley clearly took that one, 116 - 112 I had it.

Sorry if I look at a boxing match subjectively, regardless of who I'm supporting

I'm from the UK, so couldn't see Lederman's scorecard for this one, sorry to disappoint you.

[Arvid_85]

American got decision, in America against a foreigner, with American judges and American commentators...

[luke1979]

I score each individual minute on clean shots landed and at the end of the round judge it best out of three.
That way I think it is more fair as you don't give a guy the round for an eye catching combo in the last 10 seconds when his opponent won the first 2 minutes less dramatically cos its still 2-1 overall for the the round.
I also never score round even because I've never seen one.

Oh and Bradley lost 116-112 on my card.

[Hougigo]

American got decision, in America against a foreigner, with American judges and American commentators...

It was in America? I thought it was in Mexico from the way the arena sounded