Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Hearn Rejects Top Rank Offer For Burns vs. Crawford

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    Originally posted by Adamjr91 View Post
    I'm just very happy that there is nowhere left to hid for Burns. His choices are Beltran or Crawford LOL. I do expect Burns to vacate before he ever gets in the ring with Crawford though.

    P.S. Eddie Hearn is more corrupt and a bigger C*nt than Frank Warren.
    Crawford isn't anything special, Burns has nothing to fear. Point is, the dude hasn't earned a shot. He hasn't fought anyone. Kilmov ******. All fights go where the money is, and the money is clearly in Scotland in an arena fight. That's not Hearn being a c*nt, just a smart businessman. NO-ONE cares about Crawford, he has no following. As another poster said, Burns can do nothing right. He is trying to do the honourable thing by rematching Beltran. Once he beats Beltran, as I'm sure he'll do without having to brave a broken jaw, and once Crawford has beaten a top opponent, he can get it - in Glasgow unless HBO want to pay for the fight to happen in the US. Deal with it.

    Comment


    • #22
      The Burns hate is strong here hahahahaha

      The guy is willing to rematch a guy who broke his jaw, is that not the right thing to do? Beltran deserves a shot at the title far more than Crawford. I'm sure the Crawford fight will happen but the rematch takes priority, that's just the way it is.

      I personally believe Crawford v Burns in the US makes no sense, Crawford couldn't draw flies to ****, whereas Burns sells out stadiums in Scotland. The fight can only be in MSG if Burns gets the lion's share of the purse and broadcast money. Crawford has done nothing to guarantee a title shot, TR are trying to promote him as their Broner. That is all.

      Comment


      • #23
        If he's turning down Crawford to give Beltran his deserved rematch, no one should be complaining.

        Comment


        • #24
          Hearns had me fooled, I firs thought that he was up for giving his guys challenges and making good fights but it seems he is the same as the rest. I wonder who they want him to fight?

          Comment


          • #25
            Originally posted by DosRounds View Post
            Hearns had me fooled, I firs thought that he was up for giving his guys challenges and making good fights but it seems he is the same as the rest. I wonder who they want him to fight?
            Hearn is saying Beltran rematch in this article. I'm glad, I'd rather have that happen and Crawford get the winner.

            Comment


            • #26
              Rematch is the priority, and rightfully so.

              Beltran deserves to be champion right now, so the least he should get is the rematch.

              Comment


              • #27
                If you read his statement you can't really complain. He admitted defeat and is giving Beltran the rematch.

                Do a double header with Crawford on the undercard to build it up.

                Comment


                • #28
                  Originally posted by .:: JSFD26 ::. View Post
                  Burns holding belts hostage across the pond. He knows he ain't getting no bs decisions over here.


                  Posted from Boxingscene.com App for Android
                  Sooner or later the bs decisions will come to an end

                  Comment


                  • #29
                    Originally posted by bojangles1987 View Post
                    Hearn is saying Beltran rematch in this article. I'm glad, I'd rather have that happen and Crawford get the winner.
                    yeah true. Beltran deserves the rematch.

                    Comment


                    • #30
                      ... Then most of you here agree with Burns making the right decision to rematch Beltran -- which was the obvious decision...
                      Now if Burns doesn't come back, he will certainly vacate the WBO belt...

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP