Manuel Charr Returns October 19

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • BostonGuy
    Emeritus Champion
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Feb 2008
    • 13343
    • 2,119
    • 6,833
    • 900,690,265

    #21
    Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK
    Yeah because no one gives a single *** about Charr. Haye faked an injury to take a bigger, better fight.
    Yeah, and that's called being incredibly unprofessional. Oh, and what bigger fight did Haye take? Oh, I forgot, he didn't fight - he's a ****in b1tch

    Comment

    • Dirk Diggler UK
      Deleted
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Jun 2008
      • 48836
      • 1,312
      • 693
      • 58,902

      #22
      Originally posted by BostonGuy
      Yeah, and that's called being incredibly unprofessional. Oh, and what bigger fight did Haye take? Oh, I forgot, he didn't fight - he's a ****in b1tch
      Call it what you want but no one in their right mind would fight Manuel Charr over Fury. I see you're on the other thread talking about Fury "ducking" Pulev as well....lol no business sense.

      Comment

      • BostonGuy
        Emeritus Champion
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Feb 2008
        • 13343
        • 2,119
        • 6,833
        • 900,690,265

        #23
        Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK
        Call it what you want but no one in their right mind would fight Manuel Charr over Fury. I see you're on the other thread talking about Fury "ducking" Pulev as well....lol no business sense.
        Why should Haye have to pick one or other? He could've fought Charr in the summer and then faced Fury next. Again, I forgot - David Haye's a b1tch and a primadonna and he only fights once a year. That makes great financial sense, right? It also keeps fans interested.

        As to Fury, he was slated to face Pulev in an eliminator that would have given him a title shot. Again, a fight or two that makes financial sense.

        Comment

        • Dirk Diggler UK
          Deleted
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Jun 2008
          • 48836
          • 1,312
          • 693
          • 58,902

          #24
          Originally posted by BostonGuy
          Why should Haye have to pick one or other? He could've fought Charr in the summer and then faced Fury next. Again, I forgot - David Haye's a b1tch and a primadonna and he only fights once a year. That makes great financial sense, right? It also keeps fans interested.

          As to Fury, he was slated to face Pulev in an eliminator that would have given him a title shot. Again, a fight or two that makes financial sense.
          It would just have been a waste of time. Manuel Charr is a no name EuroBum. There'd be nothing really for Haye to gain by beating him except moving up the rankings towards a Klitschko - and Fury was higher ranked anyway.

          Sky have certain dates. Haye was set to fight Charr late June - the Fury PPV was set for September. Not logistically possible to do both anyway. Just no point at all - by all accounts ticket sales were bombing for the Charr fight anyway.

          As for Fury, a title shot doesn't mean ****. The Haye fight was set to earn Fury £5million. He would not get that if he fought Pulev and Wladimir twice each.

          Comment

          • techliam
            Caneloweight Champion
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Apr 2012
            • 5526
            • 371
            • 23
            • 42,424

            #25
            Charr is only relevant as he's the guy that Vitali Klitschko seemingly retired on

            Comment

            Working...
            TOP