Manuel Charr Returns October 19
Collapse
-
Call it what you want but no one in their right mind would fight Manuel Charr over Fury. I see you're on the other thread talking about Fury "ducking" Pulev as well....lol no business sense.Comment
-
Why should Haye have to pick one or other? He could've fought Charr in the summer and then faced Fury next. Again, I forgot - David Haye's a b1tch and a primadonna and he only fights once a year. That makes great financial sense, right? It also keeps fans interested.
As to Fury, he was slated to face Pulev in an eliminator that would have given him a title shot. Again, a fight or two that makes financial sense.Comment
-
It would just have been a waste of time. Manuel Charr is a no name EuroBum. There'd be nothing really for Haye to gain by beating him except moving up the rankings towards a Klitschko - and Fury was higher ranked anyway.Why should Haye have to pick one or other? He could've fought Charr in the summer and then faced Fury next. Again, I forgot - David Haye's a b1tch and a primadonna and he only fights once a year. That makes great financial sense, right? It also keeps fans interested.
As to Fury, he was slated to face Pulev in an eliminator that would have given him a title shot. Again, a fight or two that makes financial sense.
Sky have certain dates. Haye was set to fight Charr late June - the Fury PPV was set for September. Not logistically possible to do both anyway. Just no point at all - by all accounts ticket sales were bombing for the Charr fight anyway.
As for Fury, a title shot doesn't mean ****. The Haye fight was set to earn Fury £5million. He would not get that if he fought Pulev and Wladimir twice each.Comment
Comment