Me voy a reir cuando Marquez, Maidana y Khan los manden al infierno. Alguien poste el gif de cuando bumnelo hizo que Trout hiciera el baile del pollo, me quiero reír.
Guey, hablas espanglish!?
Los Mexicanos fanaticos como usted piensan con el culo. Maricon.
Well I'm sure you know that's because Brits and Mexicans are nations made up of different races.
If one is an American and one is only backing the black, white or latino fighters I'm afraid that's racially biased and discriminating on grounds of race. It doesn't mean one is "******scum" or poor/can't read but it's not really socially acceptable.
trout is african american
bradley,broner,judah and alexander are african american
so trout wanting them to win is racist
but maidana is Argentine and said Mexicans will root for him simply because he is Hispanic, but that's not racist is that what you're saying?
bradley,broner,judah and alexander are african american
so trout wanting them to win is racist
but maidana is Argentine and said Mexicans will root for him simply because he is Hispanic, but that's not racist is that what you're saying?
I didn't say Trout wanting those fighters to win is racist. He picked 3 out of 4 US fighters and it sounds like Judah is his friend. If he was rooting for them just because they were black then that is racist but there's no evidence for that being the case.
It is racist to root for someone purely because they're Hispanic because it's discriminating on the grounds of race, just as it's racist to only root for white fighters, asian fighters or black fighters.
Edit: in saying that, people call Canelo hispanic and he's white so it's a grey area
Lets clear something up here. With Trout, it is hard to tell what he really feels. All he did was make picks that could be interpreted one way or the other (Americans/friends/etc). In other words, it could be a coincidence or not. With Maidana, it was a clear message. He was trying to galvanize Mexicans to him and or against Broner. With Broner, he is branded a racist due to obvious statements he made. His comments belittled a group of people, Mexicans in particular.
Here is a fact. A racially biased remark is wrongfully seen as only having to do with race. By definition, a racially biased remark or racial slur (more specific), mostly a racially biased remark that can have to do with color, creed, nationality, even sexual preference. Yes, that last one is correct. A racist remark by definition is a derogatory comment made toward a group of people that fits a common denominator. The reason that a racial remark covers more than just race is because there had to be one blanket statement or word that would cover a number of inclusions. The school systems most likely were a big part of demystifying what is racist, what is biased, and what is not. So A) Trout's stance is undecided, B) Maidana's stance was clearly racially biased and C) Broner's words have clearly indicated he is a racist. That's the three main levels, in a nutshell.
Comment