Cotto/Rodriguez Ref + Bradley/Provodnikov

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ~AK49~
    Liquor and Whores
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Jul 2009
    • 3539
    • 216
    • 176
    • 15,073

    #11
    Lmao, difference is Rodriquez was clearly outclassed and outgunned. He was getting the **** beat out of him in a one sided affair. Ref stepping in or not, that fight was ending in the third. Rodriguez was too hurt, and too much blood was in the water.

    Long story short, in the best interest of rodriquez' health and preventing him from needlessly taking any more of a beating, it was a great stoppage.

    Comment

    • pugilistprophet1994
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Dec 2010
      • 1110
      • 44
      • 17
      • 7,608

      #12
      I think the Bradley should have been stopped. Cotto stoppage was good, a KO was inevitable.

      Comment

      • RL_GMA
        Undisputed Champion
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Jan 2008
        • 10271
        • 507
        • 103
        • 26,636

        #13
        Cotto fight was a good stoppage. Right after the end of the 2nd round you can see Delvin really not all there when he sat down. Once the 3rd started you can clearly see he was still hurt and then gets hit with a right and left hook, there was no point to go on after that.

        Comment

        • FrankieClutch
          OTSC
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • May 2009
          • 6084
          • 177
          • 396
          • 26,671

          #14
          Originally posted by RlCKY
          Different umps have different strike zones.

          I'd rather see a ref stop a fight too early than see a fighter get robbed on the cards.
          This. I sear I was going to write this damn near word for word

          Comment

          Working...
          TOP