GGG VS. COTTO at 154.... face it, Golovkin needs exposure....

[James_Toney]

and a Mayweather fight is off the cards... because of the HBO VS. SHOWTIME BS....

Cotto's a marquee name.... Golovkin loves calling out small guys, might as well prove he's not just a hype job with a big mouth and a trainer with an even bigger mouth....

HBO execs.... make it happen....

prediction: Golovkin gets his ass beat.

The winner (Cotto) gets Martinez.

That's PPV Money for HBO instead of these bull**** fights.

[ny123]

Lol no. In a perfect world we'd get Martinez Golovkin and Cotto Canelo but I think we'll get Cotto Martinez at a cw for mw title and Canelo vs a title holder at 154.

[Hougigo]

Yea... GGG will get nowhere near Cotto before Sergio

[Derranged]

GGG should not move down and I don't think Cotto should move up either. GGG might ruin himself by making the weight and Cotto is too small.

Cotto should fight the ginger next.

On another note, has there been talk about a Mayweather rematch? Since Cotto actually thinks he was robbed in that fight

[James_Toney]

GGG should not move down and I don't think Cotto should move up either. GGG might ruin himself by making the weight and Cotto is too small.

Cotto should fight the ginger next.

On another note, has there been talk about a Mayweather rematch? Since Cotto actually thinks he was robbed in that fight

If Bernard was willing to fight at a catchweight against DLH....

these dudes have no excuses.

[Derranged]

If Bernard was willing to fight at a catchweight against DLH....

these dudes have no excuses.

So then what's the appropriate cw for this? And what's wrong with Ginger McGee?

[Bigg Rigg]

Cotto vs Sergio, GGG vs Ward.

[James_Toney]

So then what's the appropriate cw for this? And what's wrong with Ginger McGee?

no catchweight... because golovkin literally brings nothing to the table....

apart from legacy points for cotto, he has nothing tangible...

but he has everything to gain from fighting cotto... fans/ exposure/ payday....

so he should have to suffer for the prospective gains....