Originally posted by WilkinsOlajuwon
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Mayweather has consistently avoided the best available opposition (Great Article)
Collapse
-
Originally posted by PBP View PostYou can tell who knows what they're talking about just by seeing if they mention Stevie Johnston.
Every time I see an article criticizing Floyd, I search for the name Stevie Johnston. If it doesn't appear, the author has no credibility on this issue to me and is just regurgitating what other people say.
IMO, that is the only true "duck" of Mayweather's career.
Add 9 names to that list.
When a fighter has threats around him and retires with great cause , its still looked at like a duck . And floyd didnt have great cause.
Floyd is an opportunist. Wake up
Comment
-
Who am I going to listen to every respected fighter and trainer or a geek who never fought decisions decisions. In ten years or so Floyd and Lebron are probably going to be call the greatest ever in there sports because the generation of fans who watch them now will be the ones with the pen and wont have clue or care what Jordan or a Ray Robinson did in the past.
Comment
-
Originally posted by dc3383 View PostSergio or Paul Williams compares to Hagler,Hearns,Duran or Benitez. Dont try to use the so called weakest name to prove a point.
Cotto may be a name as was MOsely but these guys were not in their primes...and no matter how many paper titles or rankings you dress them up with, they were what they were when he fought them.
Comment
-
Originally posted by WilkinsOlajuwon View PostWow...you are the one that made the initial comparison...dont get on me when it blows up in your face.
Cotto may be a name as was MOsely but these guys were not in their primes...and no matter how many paper titles or rankings you dress them up with, they were what they were when he fought them.
Comment
-
Originally posted by WilkinsOlajuwon View PostWow...you are the one that made the initial comparison...dont get on me when it blows up in your face.
Cotto may be a name as was MOsely but these guys were not in their primes...and no matter how many paper titles or rankings you dress them up with, they were what they were when he fought them.
oh and Floyd wasnt prime when he fought them either no one ever mentions that
Comment
-
Originally posted by Big Dunn View Postat the time he fought them they were both recognized as the best in their respective weights. or am I wrong?
again, was cotto a worthless, nothing opponent? of course not. but dont defend the fight as if it was a career defining/boosting matchup.
mosley was a good fight but to JUST call him the "best" at ww is to ignore his form at the time.
we can;t pick and choose what criteria to use when assessing a fight
Comment
-
Originally posted by WilkinsOlajuwon View PostWow...you are the one that made the initial comparison...dont get on me when it blows up in your face.
Cotto may be a name as was MOsely but these guys were not in their primes...and no matter how many paper titles or rankings you dress them up with, they were what they were when he fought them.
Comment
Comment