? For Paquiao fan's

[xzworks]

didnt mean to start ****, ment to put full you foo

LOL..im cool.. coz im a pacfan..

[THRILLAinmanila]

Since paquiao is the only thing you guys talk about i just want to see how bias some of you pac fan's are! I agree that paquiao is a real good fighter and he came out of nowere and beat two of the best fighters that has been fighting nothing but the best for the last DECADE. My beef is that some of you guys are saying that Paquiao should be up their with both Barrera and Morales in the Hall of fame and I just have to disagree with that i know he beat them both but that doesnt mean he gets all the credit for all the wars that barrera and morales been in! Paquiao has only been on the map since 04 so i think he still has to be around for ATLEAST a couple more years. SAme thing with hatton and taylor they both beat legends but that doesnt make them legends atleast not yet.

You need to re-study your boxing history and take a look at other
Filipino boxing legends . 3 of them are enshrined in the IBHOF.
The Philippines is not all Pacman

[AIR_KENG]

It is the only good fighter that they have had. They now pray to him, masterbate to him, and dream about him. Some of them feel as if Pac is the greatest fighter ever! That makes me laugh When Pac gets beat they will cry as a country and then say, "his shoes were the wrong size".

the thread starter said pacfans, and i respect his opinion but being racist again??? yes, we do give him all the support we can give him because he is the best fighter we have today... We are passionate fans... Not like your mexico, too many fighters, divided fans... you're just jealous and angry that one pinoy has dismantled countless mexicanos... lol

[machotime]

the thread starter said pacfans, and i respect his opinion but being racist again??? yes, we do give him all the support we can give him because he is the best fighter we have today... We are passionate fans... Not like your mexico, too many fighters, divided fans... you're just jealous and angry that one pinoy has dismantled countless mexicanos... lol

Im puertorican! LOL beeatch

[AIR_KENG]

Im puertorican! LOL beeatch

haha! then what an irony!!! you ****in' worshipped trinidad and tell that to us Pinoys???!!! HAHAHA!!! Go speak some more... I can't stop laughing... HAHAHAHAH!!!

[domzkidot]

bottom line pac kicks mexican ass constantly, its like a hobby!

[dep_violator]

hahah, all this shi! is true.



I bet once pacquiao is gone theyll all ninja vanish their -_- out of here.

And in the meantime kid. Enjoy eating your words. lol!

[dep_violator]

Im puertorican! LOL beeatch

Trinidad is a duck and doesn't have what it takes to win. lol!

Coming from a Puerto Rican, I just can't help but laugh.

[Papa Ace]

Since paquiao is the only thing you guys talk about i just want to see how bias some of you pac fan's are! I agree that paquiao is a real good fighter and he came out of nowere and beat two of the best fighters that has been fighting nothing but the best for the last DECADE. My beef is that some of you guys are saying that Paquiao should be up their with both Barrera and Morales in the Hall of fame and I just have to disagree with that i know he beat them both but that doesnt mean he gets all the credit for all the wars that barrera and morales been in! Paquiao has only been on the map since 04 so i think he still has to be around for ATLEAST a couple more years. SAme thing with hatton and taylor they both beat legends but that doesnt make them legends atleast not yet.

you have a point there bro but the little problem with your argument really is that you equate being a legend to that which have spent longer careers and much tv coverage, ex. eriks fights are some 50+ compared to pac's 43+ but since erik's career have been peppered with much media hype, "well-known" opponents, and mostly under PPV makes him more of a legend than pac. (?) i do not know exactly what constitute being a hall of famer, although if i would see it, it doesnt only have to be categorized by your point of view, rather in addition, the boxer's credibility and his contribution to the welfare of the sport. without having to sound like a hugger, i believe pac has shown great virtues inside the ring (you never see him dissing his opponents) and has rekindled interest in the sport previously hounded by controversies and boring results. i believe pac would make it as a hall of famer the way he's going, though i agree with you he still has his to do more of what he does best. nut-huggers are nut-huggers and they would always be bias so there's really no point in arguing with them.

[JaNnO]

you have a point there bro but the little problem with your argument really is that you equate being a legend to that which have spent longer careers and much tv coverage, ex. eriks fights are some 50+ compared to pac's 43+ but since erik's career have been peppered with much media hype, "well-known" opponents, and mostly under PPV makes him more of a legend than pac. (?) i do not know exactly what constitute being a hall of famer, although if i would see it, it doesnt only have to be categorized by your point of view, rather in addition, the boxer's credibility and his contribution to the welfare of the sport. without having to sound like a hugger, i believe pac has shown great virtues inside the ring (you never see him dissing his opponents) and has rekindled interest in the sport previously hounded by controversies and boring results. i believe pac would make it as a hall of famer the way he's going, though i agree with you he still has his to do more of what he does best. nut-huggers are nut-huggers and they would always be bias so there's really no point in arguing with them.

nice post...here's some good karma for you!