Hopkins - Floyd is top 3 All Time, better than Leonard, Hagler, Hearns

[dynomyte1444]

Probably, the best of all dimensions! Tell me right now who's better then Floyd?

Thank you very much.

All dimensions is pushing it.

and no one is better than floyd right now.

What are you thanking me for?

[dynomyte1444]

There's a middleweight on Kepler-42C (Cygnus Constellation for the casual boxing fan) who I think would give Floyd a great fight.

I never seen that guy fight but i heard of him through my samsungs dimensional note.

How do you think he would against fair Rehtaewyam dyolf from the bizarre backwards dimension?

[rambov]

Quote:
Originally Posted by FloydDGreatest
Floyd is the greatest athlete of all time, not just in boxing but all of sports. He's undefeated and the most skilled athlete in the universe.
Damn you really went all out there.

The best in the universe huh

Is he the best of all dimensions?"


HAHAHAHAHAHAHA !!!

Almost spilt my starbucks all over my ferragamo's....

Well I also think floyd is the beat I've ever seen but I think that if I needed advice on who's the greatest I would go ask you guys here on Boxing scene and not some actual belt holder.....what the hell does he know? shoot

[rambov]

Floyd's not better than Rid****.

[SBleeder]

I never seen that guy fight but i heard of him through my samsungs dimensional note.

How do you think he would against fair Rehtaewyam dyolf from the bizarre backwards dimension?

Rehtaewyam's a good southpaw and a tough fighter. I think Oaiuqcap Ynnam is ducking him.

[GeneralZod]

Mayweather would struggle with Benitez, let alone any of the other four.

[The Gambler1981]

Rehtaewyam's a good southpaw and a tough fighter. I think Oaiuqcap Ynnam is ducking him.

Oaiupcap is a very good right handed boxer with great defense though I don't know if Rehtaewyam's aggressive style will work on that.

[The Gambler1981]

Mayweather would struggle with Benitez, let alone any of the other four.

Those guys did have a tough time with Benitez also

[soul_survivor]

I mean I can see an opinion for SRL having better Boxing IQ because he was great but not so much hearns.

and even that is debateable. Just look how well and differently floyd fights people.

I have no problem with people who Rank SRL over floyd but I disagree. I disagree because I he lost to duran in his prime and lost to hagler imo.

Floyd has proven that hes on another level with his dismantling of JMM, corrales, canelo.

resume vs Resume its very hard to put Floyd over SRL but you can make a case for it

You disagree
because SRL lost to Duran in his prime....Duran being one of the top 10 greatest ever, and it was a damn close fight where SRL went to war, even though he didn't have to. That's your reason?

You think Floyd dismantling a B level brawler, a lightweight and a guy who is simply good is better than anything Leonard has done? Leonard winning the welterweight title from Benitez is greater than anything Floyd has ever done. That's how big the gap is.

And please, unless all you've seen is Hagler/Hearns, you can't be serious saying that Hearns had a lower boxing IQ than Floyd. Hearns outboxed a supreme boxer for almost 9 rounds and then in the rematch, repeated the feat and sadly got a draw. And Hearn's power was so great he put the normally iron chinned Duran to sleep, what do you think he would do to Floyd? If Hatton could catch Floyd, if 38 year old Mosley could catch Floyd, if post-prime Oscar could catch Floyd, if Castillo could catch Floyd, if post prime Cotto bloodied Floyd, you think he'd be able to avoid a primed and super fast Hearns?

This is quite possibly the worst argument ever.