Beating The Spread.

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • taansend
    In denial about UK refs
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Jan 2004
    • 2444
    • 157
    • 428
    • 9,153

    #1

    Beating The Spread.

    I have this theory about boxing.

    In American Football the bookmakers will have a 'spread'. They'll say Team A will beat Team B by 11 points or so.

    In boxing it's not as clear cut. I think that often when the underdog performs better than expected people will be OUTRAGED & call ROBBERY just because the underdog beat 'the spread'.

    I had the Burns Beltran fight as a 50/50 match. I had Beltran win by a round or so. A draw isn't a HUGE robbery. I've seen many worse & I think a lot of people are over reacting because of Beltrans losses & the fact that many North American based fans diss European boxing & vice versa (sad on both parts).

    I was at the Lennox Lewis Vitali Klitschko fight in LA & I told a load of people before than Vitali was very tough & would give Lewis a tussle. Which he did. People thought otherwise because of the Byrd bout. I knew better.

    But that uppercut from Lewis changed things in my opinion & he was on his way to a win - but Vitali won 'the spread' by performing better than expected.

    Same with Devon Alexander vs Andriy Kotelnik. I had Devon winning a close fight but because he was a big favourite & it was a close fight people screamed robbery.

    I'm not saying the Burns result was fair. This post isn't just about tonights bout. But I do think people over-react when an underdog performs better than expected.

    p.s. It did show how weak the Lightweight division is & maybe Gamboa can clean up....
  • Weebler I
    El Weeblerito I
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Dec 2007
    • 31113
    • 1,468
    • 1,648
    • 54,550

    #2
    People love to scream robbery. ROBBBBERRRRRRYY!!!!!

    actually it's kinda fun

    Comment

    • taansend
      In denial about UK refs
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Jan 2004
      • 2444
      • 157
      • 428
      • 9,153

      #3
      And ducker. And coward. And *******. And *****.

      And none of them are boxing fans.

      Comment

      • taansend
        In denial about UK refs
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Jan 2004
        • 2444
        • 157
        • 428
        • 9,153

        #4
        Originally posted by taansend
        And ducker. And coward. And *******. And *****.

        And none of them are boxing fans.
        Ha ha, that was Pa.cktard & F.lomo. Two words used by non boxing fans.

        Comment

        Working...
        TOP