Expect anti Canelo commentry next week from Paulie and co

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • KeepItObjective
    Banned
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Sep 2013
    • 1640
    • 60
    • 51
    • 1,888

    #1

    Expect anti Canelo commentry next week from Paulie and co

    Al Bernstein is a little more impartial but for the Trout Canelo fight the commentary was so anti Canelo LOL. Paulie (one of the biggest Floyd ass kissers in the game today) claimed the round where Canelo made Trout do the stanky leg should be 10-9 because Trout supposedly took over the round And there was another hilarious moment t the end of round 6 where Trout according to Bernstein was ''Ripping shots to the body!!!'' and the replay showed they mostly clearly missed....There was also another occasion where he said ''4 PUNCH COMBO BIG ROUND FOR TROUT'' And they showed the repay in slow mo and the punches CLEARLY missed most people seem to overlook Canelo's defense it seems
  • T18Z
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Apr 2013
    • 2073
    • 101
    • 66
    • 10,410

    #2
    Originally posted by KeepItObjective
    Al Bernstein is a little more impartial but for the Trout Canelo fight the commentary was so anti Canelo LOL. Paulie (one of the biggest Floyd ass kissers in the game today) claimed the round where Canelo made Trout do the stanky leg should be 10-9 because Trout supposedly took over the round And there was another hilarious moment t the end of round 6 where Trout according to Bernstein was ''Ripping shots to the body!!!'' and the replay showed they mostly clearly missed....There was also another occasion where he said ''4 PUNCH COMBO BIG ROUND FOR TROUT'' And they showed the repay in slow mo and the punches CLEARLY missed most people seem to overlook Canelo's defense it seems
    I honestly think Canelo deserved the criticism for that fight, and I do think Trout made the round a 10-9.

    I think Paulie was an excellent commentator on that fight and was being pretty truthful throughout. They would have no reason to be bias towards Trout anyway.

    Comment

    • #YOLO
      Interim Champion
      Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
      • Dec 2012
      • 712
      • 27
      • 0
      • 7,001

      #3
      Originally posted by T18Z
      I honestly think Canelo deserved the criticism for that fight, and I do think Trout made the round a 10-9.

      I think Paulie was an excellent commentator on that fight and was being pretty truthful throughout. They would have no reason to be bias towards Trout anyway.
      It should be illegal for you to reproduce.

      Comment

      • oneon11
        Interim Champion
        • Apr 2013
        • 758
        • 62
        • 0
        • 6,877

        #4
        Guess who else get those calls???

        Originally posted by KeepItObjective
        Al Bernstein is a little more impartial but for the Trout Canelo fight the commentary was so anti Canelo LOL. Paulie (one of the biggest Floyd ass kissers in the game today) claimed the round where Canelo made Trout do the stanky leg should be 10-9 because Trout supposedly took over the round And there was another hilarious moment t the end of round 6 where Trout according to Bernstein was ''Ripping shots to the body!!!'' and the replay showed they mostly clearly missed....There was also another occasion where he said ''4 PUNCH COMBO BIG ROUND FOR TROUT'' And they showed the repay in slow mo and the punches CLEARLY missed most people seem to overlook Canelo's defense it seems
        You're complaining about the commentators and them seeing punches that didn't land. Well my friends every punch Oscar threw somehow connected when in fact they didn't. And the Bradley-Pac fight if I wasn't watching it with my own eyes you would ha e thought Manny was killing Bradley. That's why Bradley won that figbt because the judges saw that none of Manny's so call devastating punches were landing. Bradley beat Manny because he actually was whooping Manny's ass....

        Comment

        • KeepItObjective
          Banned
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Sep 2013
          • 1640
          • 60
          • 51
          • 1,888

          #5
          Originally posted by oneon11
          You're complaining about the commentators and them seeing punches that didn't land. Well my friends every punch Oscar threw somehow connected when in fact they didn't. And the Bradley-Pac fight if I wasn't watching it with my own eyes you would ha e thought Manny was killing Bradley. That's why Bradley won that figbt because the judges saw that none of Manny's so call devastating punches were landing. Bradley beat Manny because he actually was whooping Manny's ass....

          Comment

          • Foreign Soil
            First Time Skeptic
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Jul 2013
            • 5249
            • 194
            • 219
            • 11,783

            #6
            The new trend of calling rounds 10-09 when they're just happy their fighter didn't go down to the canvas is quite putrid. Showtime commentary sucks all around.

            Comment

            • pesticid
              Banned
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Aug 2006
              • 7236
              • 456
              • 500
              • 20,597

              #7
              Paulie shouldn't be commentating this fight because as good as he is commentating, h's very biased when it comes to Floyd.

              How do you go and do interviews saying that Canelo has no chance and then you gonna give props to Canelo when Canelo does well?

              I understand the notion of keeping it real but you already have an established agenda and anything that Canelo does safe for a knockout will be ignored. I mean he landed a great shot on Trout and it was like it didn't even matter. I thought I am not sure but I thought that Paulie picked Trout over Canelo as well and guess what he didn't give him much credit during the fight.

              I love Paulie's commentating, I just hated him in the Canelo vs Trout fight because I thought he was broadcasting with an already established agenda that Canelo wasn't all that.

              I hope he doesn't make the same mistake in the Floyd vs Canelo fight but he already went on record saying Floyd is the greatest who ever fought after Floyd going twelve with Guerrero and in his own words wasn't easy for Floyd because Guerrero was always in the fight. I mean if you proclaim Floyd as the greatest after a W12 over Guerrero who was in his third fight at WW you have reached in my opinion the highest point of being fan, being a nit-hugger more so

              Comment

              • Paulie-M
                Banned
                Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
                • May 2012
                • 91
                • 7
                • 0
                • 196

                #8
                im NOT a Floyd ass kicker, **** up OP , phagot ***** ass *****

                Comment

                • thebowtod
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Jan 2009
                  • 1702
                  • 52
                  • 0
                  • 7,906

                  #9
                  pauli was clearly biased in that fight

                  Comment

                  • KeepItObjective
                    Banned
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Sep 2013
                    • 1640
                    • 60
                    • 51
                    • 1,888

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Rocky=Ward
                    pauli was clearly biased in that fight
                    And he will be next week

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP