Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Show me 8 rounds that Burns could've won

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    Originally posted by PBP View Post
    He could have scored an even round
    I haven't done the math yet, but for 114-114.... there has to be something missing.

    A 10-8 or a 9-9 would've come from that.... I still feel like the draw score shouldn't e 114-114 from that.

    Comment


    • #12
      that was a joke of a scorecard. Burns is ***** his coward arse should leave UK and fight Beltran on USA if he was a man. I gave Burns 5 rounds, and fine if you were really jealous say you gave him 6 at the MAX, still he hould have lost

      Comment


      • #13
        Originally posted by hougigo View Post
        I haven't done the math yet, but for 114-114.... there has to be something missing.

        A 10-8 or a 9-9 would've come from that.... I still feel like the draw score shouldn't e 114-114 from that.
        I agree man

        Comment


        • #14
          Missed the fight but I've come to the conclusion that beltran was robbed. Lol burns sucks.

          Comment


          • #15
            The whole thing shows how much of a farce boxing can be at times. No wonder so many boxers try for the knockout rather than leave it these disgraceful f****** judges.

            I am a scot and a Ricky Burns fan but he clearly lost that fight.

            Comment


            • #16
              Originally posted by Tommy Gun View Post
              Missed the fight but I've come to the conclusion that beltran was robbed. Lol burns sucks.
              The funny thing, not one person in the RBR had Ricky winning, but somehow a judge gave Ricky 8 rounds.

              Comment


              • #17
                Originally posted by hougigo View Post
                I haven't done the math yet, but for 114-114.... there has to be something missing.

                A 10-8 or a 9-9 would've come from that.... I still feel like the draw score shouldn't e 114-114 from that.
                Hypothetically

                Burns:

                10*6 = 60
                10 *1 = 10 (Even Round)
                9*4 = 36
                8*1 = 8

                114

                Beltran:

                10*5 = 50
                10*1 = 10 (even round)
                9*6 = 54

                114

                Comment


                • #18
                  Originally posted by PBP View Post
                  Hypothetically

                  Burns:

                  10*6 = 60
                  10 *1 = 10 (Even Round)
                  9*4 = 36
                  8*1 = 8

                  114

                  Beltran:

                  10*5 = 50
                  10*1 = 10 (even round)
                  9*6 = 54

                  114
                  Makes sense... I'm just pissed right now

                  Comment


                  • #19
                    Originally posted by WarMaidana View Post
                    that was a joke of a scorecard. Burns is ***** his coward arse should leave UK and fight Beltran on USA if he was a man. I gave Burns 5 rounds, and fine if you were really jealous say you gave him 6 at the MAX, still he hould have lost
                    Did you just call a professional fighter who fought through 10 rounds with a dislocated jaw, and who get up from the floor, a coward? smh

                    Boxing fans sometimes..

                    Comment


                    • #20
                      Pick any 8 you want and check them down and there you have it , literally that's how professional judges do it not sure why novices like posters really think they can do better.Actually analyzing rounds by effectiveness and stuff like that.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP