Comments Thread For: Ricky Burns vs. Ray Beltran Early Action

[MDPopescu]

So Ricky Burns won because Beltran didn't get a KO? You are delusional lol. Maybe Beltran could not get the KO due the fact that Burns was constantly Holding like a little Scottish girl and the Ref did not to stop it.

... I strongly doubt that smoking monkeys know what "tongue in cheek" is...

[LAFIRPO]

... Beautiful decision -- Burns retains belt because of the draw decision...
Burns was literally great... Bravo... (Beltran did all he could not to finish him...)

I am just wondering if you're ******ed.

[MDPopescu]

I am just wondering if you're ******ed.

I'm desolated on how low the sense on humor can be on this site...

[golden247]

So called boxing fans

Reading some of your comments and especially those of you who believe the draw was the correct decision really sickens me. Beltran won that fight and for once Johnny Nelson spoke the truth as opposed to the usual bullshìt he spouts.

Reality check díckheads these guys put their lives on the line to earn a living and because sky sports have invested in boxing again that means as long as they're the major players involved in a card like this where HBO or other promotional power houses are not they'll ensure the refs and judges give their boy all benefits.

Fücking disgusting, bear in mind I'm British and was rooting for Ricky but seeing the referee in action I knew if Beltran didn't KO burns he'd never get the decision. So all in all the entire card of boxing tonight was complete and utter shìte!

[prinzemanspopa]

Fair play to Johnny Nelson; he was the only one of the broadcasting team to acknowledge that it was a clear gift.

Why would anyone be surprised at the decision. There were many close rounds and those go to Burns automatically in the UK.. Both are bums and Broner would have knocked Burns out.. I don't think Beltran really beat Lundy either..

Lundy clearly lost six rounds.

He kicked Lundy's ass.

No.

[LAFIRPO]

Why would anyone be surprised at the decision. There were many close rounds and those go to Burns automatically in the UK.. Both are bums and Broner would have knocked Burns out.. I don't think Beltran really beat Lundy either..

Your logic is strange. Who cares if Broner beats both of them on the same night, if Beltran beats Burns then he should be awarded the correct decision.

One thing has nothing to do with the other.

[kizzle]

Jesus even jim watt had it for Beltran; nothing more needs to said...

[LAFIRPO]

well did he associate himself with a steroid chemist or not?

He can associate himself with Alex Rodriguez for all I care. Unless you have any legitimate proof the only think your doing is talking out of your a s s .

My guess is that your Burns fanboy and was devastated he got spanked.

[LAFIRPO]

Jesus even jim watt had it for Beltran; nothing more needs to said...

Haha, good point, that dude is the most dumb and biased announcer I've ever heard.

[golden247]

Jesus even jim watt had it for Beltran; nothing more needs to said...

Lol exactly! I just don't understand how other people delude themselves. Jim watts has got to be one of the most biased guys in the world yet he even stated Ricky should've been deducted points for excessive clinching!