Stop feeding that racist cocksucking troll.
Only Loosers Hate Winners
Collapse
-
I think Broner has fought better comp than Canelo personally. But being undefeated is not everything. Ali has losses but no one would say Joe Calzaghe should be ranked higher as a p4p atg
Quality of opposition means a lot more.Comment
-
-
Difference is that Robinson went 80-0 till he got outweighed by Lamata, Ali got cheated out of his prime and lost when he was old. They would been undefeated today. Love keeps getting better with every fight. The Rosado fight was a learning experiance for a future champ and he won't make those same mistakes againAgain I ask, and maybe this time you will answer. You are saying you have to be undefeated to be good? Yet you discredit Marciano and praise Ali?
You make no sense.
You say Canelo and Golovkin arepart time undefeated? Then what is Love? He lost to Rosado in reality. Then got caught cheating.Comment
-
I like people based on the respect they give, whether they entertain me and whether I can empathise with them. Manny Pacquiao has lost a few fights but he is an entertaining fighter who goes balls out to win. Juan Manuel Marquez entertains me because he is skilled and tactical yet not afraid to have a fight. I don't like how Mayweather brags about himself and speaks in the 3rd person, Broner is a just a ****ing dumb turtle looking midget with no class, and the rest of the fighters you've mentioned just don't do anything for me. Wladimir Klitschko is my favourite fighter because he just keeps his trap shut and does his job.Comment
-
Since 10 out of the 11 fighters you list as hated winners are black and all of the fighters you say are loved losers are not black this seems like a race issue with you.That expression "only losers hate winners" is not famous. I never heard it before. There is more to fans liking or disliking a fighter than their win loss record. The way fighters conduct themselves outside the ring and treat people matters too. Bradley said he does not like Mayweather so there is a winner that hates another winner. You trash Pacquiao as a loser but about 96% of the fans and experts thought Pacquiao clearly beat Bradley who is on your winners list. I think most of the fans that don't like Mayweather and Broner don't dislike them because they win fights. They dislike them because they are arrogant conceited braggers that disrespect other fighters. Most of the guys on your list are not all that hated. Mayweather is very popular on boxing scene. You can't tell fans who to like or dislike because they will decide for themselves. If they choose to dislike a winning fighter that does not make them a loser. That is just pure BS.Comment
-
He didn't say LOSER, Boliodogs. He said LOOSER. And that's what makes this thread so brilliant.Since 10 out of the 11 fighters you list as hated winners are black and all of the fighters you say are loved losers are not black this seems like a race issue with you.That expression "only losers hate winners" is not famous. I never heard it before. There is more to fans liking or disliking a fighter than their win loss record. The way fighters conduct themselves outside the ring and treat people matters too. Bradley said he does not like Mayweather so there is a winner that hates another winner. You trash Pacquiao as a loser but about 96% of the fans and experts thought Pacquiao clearly beat Bradley who is on your winners list. I think most of the fans that don't like Mayweather and Broner don't dislike them because they win fights. They dislike them because they are arrogant conceited braggers that disrespect other fighters. Most of the guys on your list are not all that hated. Mayweather is very popular on boxing scene. You can't tell fans who to like or dislike because they will decide for themselves. If they choose to dislike a winning fighter that does not make them a loser. That is just pure BS.Comment

Comment