Only Loosers Hate Winners

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Szef
    Face of Boxing
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Feb 2012
    • 15017
    • 2,490
    • 1,557
    • 253,303

    #41
    Stop feeding that racist cocksucking troll.

    Comment

    • BigZigga
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Apr 2012
      • 1359
      • 56
      • 363
      • 8,732

      #42
      I think Broner has fought better comp than Canelo personally. But being undefeated is not everything. Ali has losses but no one would say Joe Calzaghe should be ranked higher as a p4p atg
      Quality of opposition means a lot more.

      Comment

      • taansend
        In denial about UK refs
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Jan 2004
        • 2444
        • 157
        • 428
        • 9,153

        #43
        What a brilliant thread

        The thread starter is a comic genius.

        "Loosers"

        Comment

        • JaYDeuce11
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Jun 2012
          • 1151
          • 44
          • 1
          • 8,029

          #44
          what a ****** *** thread.
          Say this to Muhammed Ali, Sugar Ray Robinson

          Comment

          • MAKING_MONEY
            Banned
            Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
            • Aug 2013
            • 129
            • 15
            • 3
            • 239

            #45
            Originally posted by Lovci
            Again I ask, and maybe this time you will answer. You are saying you have to be undefeated to be good? Yet you discredit Marciano and praise Ali?

            You make no sense.

            You say Canelo and Golovkin arepart time undefeated? Then what is Love? He lost to Rosado in reality. Then got caught cheating.
            Difference is that Robinson went 80-0 till he got outweighed by Lamata, Ali got cheated out of his prime and lost when he was old. They would been undefeated today. Love keeps getting better with every fight. The Rosado fight was a learning experiance for a future champ and he won't make those same mistakes again

            Comment

            • taansend
              In denial about UK refs
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Jan 2004
              • 2444
              • 157
              • 428
              • 9,153

              #46
              Terry Marsh wasn't a looser.

              Except for that time when he was in prison for shooting Frank Warren (allegedly) . He was probably pretty loose then

              Comment

              • AndyMegLlo83
                Amateur
                Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
                • Feb 2013
                • 14
                • 1
                • 0
                • 6,051

                #47
                I like people based on the respect they give, whether they entertain me and whether I can empathise with them. Manny Pacquiao has lost a few fights but he is an entertaining fighter who goes balls out to win. Juan Manuel Marquez entertains me because he is skilled and tactical yet not afraid to have a fight. I don't like how Mayweather brags about himself and speaks in the 3rd person, Broner is a just a ****ing dumb turtle looking midget with no class, and the rest of the fighters you've mentioned just don't do anything for me. Wladimir Klitschko is my favourite fighter because he just keeps his trap shut and does his job.

                Comment

                • boliodogs
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • May 2008
                  • 33358
                  • 824
                  • 1,782
                  • 309,589

                  #48
                  Since 10 out of the 11 fighters you list as hated winners are black and all of the fighters you say are loved losers are not black this seems like a race issue with you.That expression "only losers hate winners" is not famous. I never heard it before. There is more to fans liking or disliking a fighter than their win loss record. The way fighters conduct themselves outside the ring and treat people matters too. Bradley said he does not like Mayweather so there is a winner that hates another winner. You trash Pacquiao as a loser but about 96% of the fans and experts thought Pacquiao clearly beat Bradley who is on your winners list. I think most of the fans that don't like Mayweather and Broner don't dislike them because they win fights. They dislike them because they are arrogant conceited braggers that disrespect other fighters. Most of the guys on your list are not all that hated. Mayweather is very popular on boxing scene. You can't tell fans who to like or dislike because they will decide for themselves. If they choose to dislike a winning fighter that does not make them a loser. That is just pure BS.

                  Comment

                  • boliodogs
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • May 2008
                    • 33358
                    • 824
                    • 1,782
                    • 309,589

                    #49
                    You need to check your facts. Robinson was never 80 and 0. He was 78 wins 0 losses and 2 draws. Draws are not wins even for the great Ray Robinson.

                    Comment

                    • taansend
                      In denial about UK refs
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • Jan 2004
                      • 2444
                      • 157
                      • 428
                      • 9,153

                      #50
                      Originally posted by boliodogs
                      Since 10 out of the 11 fighters you list as hated winners are black and all of the fighters you say are loved losers are not black this seems like a race issue with you.That expression "only losers hate winners" is not famous. I never heard it before. There is more to fans liking or disliking a fighter than their win loss record. The way fighters conduct themselves outside the ring and treat people matters too. Bradley said he does not like Mayweather so there is a winner that hates another winner. You trash Pacquiao as a loser but about 96% of the fans and experts thought Pacquiao clearly beat Bradley who is on your winners list. I think most of the fans that don't like Mayweather and Broner don't dislike them because they win fights. They dislike them because they are arrogant conceited braggers that disrespect other fighters. Most of the guys on your list are not all that hated. Mayweather is very popular on boxing scene. You can't tell fans who to like or dislike because they will decide for themselves. If they choose to dislike a winning fighter that does not make them a loser. That is just pure BS.
                      He didn't say LOSER, Boliodogs. He said LOOSER. And that's what makes this thread so brilliant.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP