Who Beat Shane Mosley More Convincingly? Floyd Mayweather or Saul Alvarez?
Collapse
-
Comment
-
Realizing the difference between a champion at the best weight class he can fight at coming off of his second best career victory and fighting a non-champion coming off a lopsided beating, a crappy draw to Sergio Mora and another lopsided beating where he ran almost the whole fight for the first time in his life to prove he was mentally and physically out of it: PricelessComment
-
Comment
-
shane was a much more viable commodity against mayweather. he was coming off of one of the better wins of his career. there was a layoff, but he was on a lot of people's p4p list after margarito.
mayweather was badly hurt against mosley. he remained composed, but he was hurt.
against alvarez mosley looked ancient. his punches lacked snap throughout. he could not capitalize on any openings.
alvarez beat him more convincingly, but only because shane was a dead man walking. he didn't impress me a ton that night.Comment
-
Truly dumb question........ Why ask a question about a guy most who will vote hate because of who he is..... Let's be honest, Floyd could be some ass kissing guy for the media, be down right the best good guy boxing ever seen and for two reason peop would still hate him. Being black & undefeated eats those sick minded people all to pieces. .... Flip the script and make Floyd a white guy or a Mexican & everyone would be worshipping like he's the best thing since slice bread......Comment
-
It was about the same. Although Shane admitted he was hurt for Mayweather and Pacquiao but healthy for Canelo. I was surprised how often Mosely was able to land. His defense more than his stamina will be a huge liability against Floyd.Comment
-
Thats one great pic you have thereComment
Comment