I've heard this argument put forth many times before - That compubox could be much more accurate if they doubled or tripled their staff. I honestly don't know how anybody who has been watching the sport for more than a few years could even come to that conclusion.
It's a total cluster**** right now with 2 guys, as is. Double or triple the amount of people at the table and you're also doubling or tripling the amount of human error that's bound to occur.
I'd love to see what the numbers would look like under your scenario, though. My guess is that the guys involved wouldn't even be able to agree on the final numbers by the end of the first round. Either that or they'd be even more woefully inaccurate than they are right now.
It's a total cluster**** right now with 2 guys, as is. Double or triple the amount of people at the table and you're also doubling or tripling the amount of human error that's bound to occur.
I'd love to see what the numbers would look like under your scenario, though. My guess is that the guys involved wouldn't even be able to agree on the final numbers by the end of the first round. Either that or they'd be even more woefully inaccurate than they are right now.
Comment