find me worse booing from uk crowd than Froch dirrell??

[ИATAS]

but the punch stats, press row and boxing experts didn't all disagree with you..as does boxrec.

What punch stats? Lol there was no compubox. Froch probably landed 30 punches total half being rabbit punches. Froch was so frustrated he couldn't land so he started getting desperate. In fact the biggest, clean shots were landed by Dirrell.

But hey we all know you love Theltic **** and that's what this is truly about, just like all your threads.

[slimshandy69]

Calm down and deep breathes? Youre the one feeling all hurt that i think he lost. And whats up with you going all in with the nationalism? Just cause im an american doesnt mean i was rooting against him or trying to come up with things to discredit his "win". But go on thinking he won if it makes you proud to be English cause thats whats important to you and it shows

mate you debate to me, no shame in that. Just don't take it to heart. Next time though, actually watch the fight if you want a chance to even get close to outdebating me.

Good luck with your life though mate.

[GRboxing]

slimshandy

[slimshandy69]

What punch stats? Lol there was no compubox. Froch probably landed 30 punches total half being rabbit punches. Froch was so frustrated he couldn't land so he started getting desperate. In fact the biggest, clean shots were landed by Dirrell.

But hey we all know you love Theltic **** and that's what this is truly about, just like all your threads.

Boxrec relased punch stats that had froch landing more punches.

Manny stewart, dan Rafael, graham Houston, steve bunce the press row and the main scorers all agreed with me, whom was actually there, live at ring side...and you are randomer on the net...

as I say ill leave it to bigragu t break down the fight.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JxWNh7QjoKo&list=PLE0151C6DE4CF7488

[RightJab]

England won that fight.

[Sugar Adam Ali]

I like how people debate, and use the line i watched multiple times or i watched this fight a couple of times,,,

truth of the matter is, you or judges can only score the fight one-time while its live,, judges cant go rewatch it, or have slow-mo replays,,,, You should just score the fight the first time you saw it, especially live,,, that would be an accurate score,,, reviewing the fight again wont change the scorecards, even though it may change your personal score of the fight....

I watched dirrel-froch one time, when it was live on tv,,, I thought Dirrell won an extremely narrow decision, 114-113

Now i could rewatch it, look for things i missed, maybe have froch winning it, but that doesnt change how i would have scored it live,,,,,,,

[Uncle Rodge]

Long time ago, but Hagler v Minter was shameful.

Another world, friend.

[boxingfocus]

Every time they came together, dirrell just threw himself onto the floor to avoid frochs punches! Even his promoter said he needed to stand and fight more if he was going to win big fights. Good skills but zero bravery.

QFT.

Dirrell fought only the 2nd half of the fight. He did nothing in the 1st half so conceded it on negative tactics whilst Froch attempted to engage.

I can't remember my round-by-round scoring (certainly not going to watch it again) but I'd given it to Froch and mainly due to Dirrell being so negative. You can't run away like that. It's a boxing match, not a game of tag.

The irony is that Dirrell showed he was technically the superior boxer in the few rounds he actually did stuff. However he didn't want to fight, so brought the loss on himself.

Just because Froch looked ****, that does not mean he should have lost. You have to score it round to round, not on who you feel looks better over the course of 12 rounds.

[Fetta]

I like how people debate, and use the line i watched multiple times or i watched this fight a couple of times,,,

truth of the matter is, you or judges can only score the fight one-time while its live,, judges cant go rewatch it, or have slow-mo replays,,,, You should just score the fight the first time you saw it, especially live,,, that would be an accurate score,,, reviewing the fight again wont change theorecards, even though it may change your personal score of the fight....

I watched dirrel-froch one time, when it was live on tv,,, I thought Dirrell won an extremely narrow decision, 114-113

Now i could rewatch it, look for things i missed, maybe have froch winning it, but that doesnt change how i would have scored it live,,,,,,,

I scored it live for Dirrell but according to the Englishmen I didn't even see it so I mentioned that. Which I do watch fights again anyway

[New England]

most people thought dirrell won that fight. he behaved like a girl, so i have no problem with him not getting the nod, but let's not act like froch beat him up.

dirrell teed off on froch. people forget that. if andre dirrell had nuts and a chin like andre ward he'd stop froch.