Tweet
All I see is amateurs this amateurs that. Its the pros not the amateurs. With a record of 396 -1 F#CK amateurs. Lets talk about fighting period. Who has come close to that? Who? Rigondeaux? And I love Rigondeaux! 400 some odd fights and 12 or some such shyt losses and a champ with 12 fights. These people are special. Period. Stop all the bullshyt oh lets see in the pros. Special is special period. With people like this its not a question of amateurs and pros its a question of fighting. And these guys are special fighters period. Too much talk of overestimating Lomachenko. I on the other hand believe its too much UNderestimating of the man. How will he transition to the pros? He fought like a pro in the ams! People really dont follow careers they just read boxrec or read statistics and base shyt off that. Amateurs to pros lmfao. If you guys think he wont transition well in the pros then youve never followed his career and youve never seen him fight. Same thing said about rigondeaux and regardless if it wasnt exciting to these a$$ holes the man schooled the living daylights out of your much more experience PRO p4p fighter. After a while its not a question of amateur or pro it's if the guy can fight. And Lomachenko can ****in fight. 396 wins and 1 loss? Cmon dyckheads wake the **** up and stop with the hating.
-
-
It's hard to know how he or any amateur fighter will do against the best fighters in the world and in 12 round fights. Rigo and what he did is very special and Happens extremely rarely, infact Loma failing is the most probable outcome -
I definitely do not agree with a title fight in 2 fights. But in not more than 10 thats possible and it should be done fairly quickly in my opinion especially due to his style. That furious pace can only be hold onto with age for soo long. Not even held on through a fight but I mean generally speaking. He should be peaking right about now or pretty soon.Last edited by {Pito}; 08-18-2013, 08:32 PM.Comment
Comment