Watch It, Re-Score, What do u think?

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • JDezi4
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Jul 2010
    • 3822
    • 95
    • 194
    • 10,052

    #21
    Originally posted by Rome-By-Ko

    But long story short,there was no robbery in this fight..it was nothing more then a close fight..

    7-6 Judah..
    I'm not gonna argue, but it just seems like u gave all the close rounds to Judah... It could be just a style preference, but it does seem like a stretch that all of them (and I admit there were a lot) would go to Judah

    I said this before in a PM, but just becuz a round was close, doesn't mean their wasn't a clear winner...

    I just wish the rules to judge boxing were black and white
    Last edited by JDezi4; 08-12-2013, 09:02 AM.

    Comment

    • Rome-By-Ko
      The winner Is
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Mar 2009
      • 20157
      • 323
      • 332
      • 29,833

      #22
      Originally posted by JDezi4
      I'm not gonna argue, but it just seems like u gave all the close rounds to Judah... It could be just a style preference, but it does seem like a stretch that all of them (and I admit there were a lot) would go to Judah

      I said this before in a PM, but just becuz a round was close, doesn't mean their wasn't a clear winner...

      I just wish the rules to judge boxing were black and white
      My rd by rd was done while watching the fight back,I just scored it how I saw it..No argument needed imo..This was a close fight,and if someone seen it or gave certain rds I gave to Judah to Matt's..I really can't be mad at it..

      Comment

      • Canelo Phresh
        LUCAS KO'S FLOYD
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Jun 2010
        • 13714
        • 829
        • 1,353
        • 23,724

        #23
        had lucas winning by 2 points have it written down somewhere but idk where it is.

        Comment

        • The Gambler1981
          Undisputed Champion
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • May 2008
          • 25961
          • 520
          • 774
          • 49,039

          #24
          Originally posted by JDezi4
          I'm not gonna argue, but it just seems like u gave all the close rounds to Judah... It could be just a style preference, but it does seem like a stretch that all of them (and I admit there were a lot) would go to Judah

          I said this before in a PM, but just becuz a round was close, doesn't mean their wasn't a clear winner...

          I just wish the rules to judge boxing were black and white
          If you like the work of one guy in one close round you are likely to give him the other close rounds, as a judge you don't sit there and think oh I gave this guy the last close round I need to even it up. So it isn't strange at all that one guy would win the close round on someones card. That is how it goes and that is why boxing scores can vary widely you could give all the close rounds to one guy or the other and anywhere in between.


          Also saying someone can win a round close but clear I think is faulty, if you win it clear you win it clear if it is close that is acknowledging that someone may be able to see a round differently than you did even if you clearly don't agree.

          Comment

          • JDezi4
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Jul 2010
            • 3822
            • 95
            • 194
            • 10,052

            #25
            Originally posted by The Gambler1981
            If you like the work of one guy in one close round you are likely to give him the other close rounds, as a judge you don't sit there and think oh I gave this guy the last close round I need to even it up. So it isn't strange at all that one guy would win the close round on someones card. That is how it goes and that is why boxing scores can vary widely you could give all the close rounds to one guy or the other and anywhere in between.


            Also saying someone can win a round close but clear I think is faulty, if you win it clear you win it clear if it is close that is acknowledging that someone may be able to see a round differently than you did even if you clearly don't agree.
            Its just like a race... U can win a race, but ur opponent might not be more than an inch behind...

            If a round is close, it just means the work that was done was near even, doesn't mean it was even... I like I said if boxing had a black and white scoring system these problems wouldn't happen

            Comment

            • Rome-By-Ko
              The winner Is
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Mar 2009
              • 20157
              • 323
              • 332
              • 29,833

              #26
              Originally posted by JDezi4
              Its just like a race... U can win a race, but ur opponent might not be more than an inch behind...

              If a round is close, it just means the work that was done was near even, doesn't mean it was even... I like I said if boxing had a black and white scoring system these problems wouldn't happen
              I really don't think there's away to have a black and white scoring system tho..The sport it self is to subjective..

              Comment

              • Russian Crushin
                atheist with a gun
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Dec 2009
                • 33788
                • 1,471
                • 836
                • 46,625

                #27
                Originally posted by The Gambler1981
                If you like the work of one guy in one close round you are likely to give him the other close rounds, as a judge you don't sit there and think oh I gave this guy the last close round I need to even it up. So it isn't strange at all that one guy would win the close round on someones card. That is how it goes and that is why boxing scores can vary widely you could give all the close rounds to one guy or the other and anywhere in between.


                Also saying someone can win a round close but clear I think is faulty, if you win it clear you win it clear if it is close that is acknowledging that someone may be able to see a round differently than you did even if you clearly don't agree.
                You had berto winning rounds that were clearly easily won by Soto.

                Those 2 fights are not hard to score if you take in account punched landed. Now if you ignore them and focus on everything else then it makes sense how you have such horrible scorecards from time to time.

                Comment

                • Russian Crushin
                  atheist with a gun
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Dec 2009
                  • 33788
                  • 1,471
                  • 836
                  • 46,625

                  #28
                  Originally posted by Rome-By-Ko
                  I really don't think there's away to have a black and white scoring system tho..The sport it self is to subjective..
                  Yes there is, its the person who lands the better punches.

                  Comment

                  • Rome-By-Ko
                    The winner Is
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Mar 2009
                    • 20157
                    • 323
                    • 332
                    • 29,833

                    #29
                    Originally posted by Russian Crushin
                    Yes there is, its the person who lands the better punches.
                    To you,not to everyone else..Which you fail to see time and time again..It's not that cut and dry cause other things are happening within a rd that you are not accounting for when you say who lands the better punches..

                    A guy lands two solid shots,while the other guy lands decent glancing shots more often..Who does the rd go to??It will all depend on the individual scoring the fight..

                    Comment

                    • Russian Crushin
                      atheist with a gun
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Dec 2009
                      • 33788
                      • 1,471
                      • 836
                      • 46,625

                      #30
                      Originally posted by Rome-By-Ko
                      To you,not to everyone else..Which you fail to see time and time again..It's not that cut and dry cause other things are happening within a rd that you are not accounting for when you say who lands the better punches..

                      A guy lands two solid shots,while the other guy lands decent glancing shots more often..Who does the rd go to??It will all depend on the individual scoring the fight..
                      Thats all you need.

                      So many people have no idea how to score fights, just look at how many people thought Paulie actually had a close fight with Broner. He didnt

                      Anyway judah didnt even land more glancing Blows. Not only did lucas outland him by a ton but they were also the hard, cleaner shots.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP