Apparently you didn't read the final paragraph of my post: if you want to convince yourself that a fight's outcome is certain, you can twist logic to do so.
DigitalBeast took a bunch of random points of data and used them to argue that Pacquiao would likely be trouble for Floyd. I took a bunch of random points of data and used them to show that you could easily argue for an opposite outcome.
Obviously, unless and until Mayweather and Pacquiao actually fight each other, we'll never know what happens in the ring. And even then, half the people here would continue to argue about what would have happened if they fought years ago.
DigitalBeast took a bunch of random points of data and used them to argue that Pacquiao would likely be trouble for Floyd. I took a bunch of random points of data and used them to show that you could easily argue for an opposite outcome.
Obviously, unless and until Mayweather and Pacquiao actually fight each other, we'll never know what happens in the ring. And even then, half the people here would continue to argue about what would have happened if they fought years ago.
Comment