Comments Thread For: Khan: Alexander Making Excuses, I'll Fight Him Anywhere

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Rome-By-Ko
    The winner Is
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Mar 2009
    • 20157
    • 323
    • 332
    • 29,833

    #61
    Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK
    Guerrero is apparently a 4 division world champ. Bradley is only a 2 division champ. Guerrero is twice as "accomplished" as Bradley!
    It's arguable,I don't agree cause Guerrero started at a lower weight..He also never fought the top of the div(meaning the num 1 or 2 ranked guy)except for Floyd..I do rate Guerrero highly,he does have losses as well while Bradley is undefeated..

    I think it's arguable..

    Oh sorry I read it wrong..Your right,so is Broner..
    Last edited by Rome-By-Ko; 08-04-2013, 11:41 AM.

    Comment

    • Ray*
      Be safe!!!
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Jul 2005
      • 44867
      • 1,654
      • 1,608
      • 558,890

      #62
      I don't know why people are on here arguing for, Alexander is not obligated to fight Khan, if Khan offers him a fight and he doesn't want to take it then Khan should move on, all these crap about deserving or no deserving is just pathetic excuses from boxing fans.

      Comment

      • Dirk Diggler UK
        Deleted
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Jun 2008
        • 48836
        • 1,312
        • 693
        • 58,902

        #63
        Originally posted by Rome-By-Ko
        It's arguable,I don't agree cause Guerrero started at a lower weight..He also never fought the top of the div(meaning the num 1 or 2 ranked guy)except for Floyd..I do rate Guerrero highly,he does have losses as well while Bradley is undefeated..

        I think it's arguable..
        How come you take into account who they've fought when it's Bradley/Guerrero but you don't when it's Khan/Alexander?

        Using your logic, Guerrero is twice as accomplished as Bradley. 4 divsion >>>>>2 divisions. No argument at all.

        Comment

        • Rome-By-Ko
          The winner Is
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Mar 2009
          • 20157
          • 323
          • 332
          • 29,833

          #64
          Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK
          How come you take into account who they've fought when it's Bradley/Guerrero but you don't when it's Khan/Alexander?

          Using your logic, Guerrero is twice as accomplished as Bradley. 4 divsion >>>>>2 divisions. No argument at all.
          Re-read the edited post again..There is no denying it..

          Comment

          • Dirk Diggler UK
            Deleted
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Jun 2008
            • 48836
            • 1,312
            • 693
            • 58,902

            #65
            Originally posted by Rome-By-Ko
            Oh sorry I read it wrong..Your right,so is Broner..
            You are actually saying that Adrien Broner is more accomplished than Bradley?

            Comment

            • Rome-By-Ko
              The winner Is
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Mar 2009
              • 20157
              • 323
              • 332
              • 29,833

              #66
              Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK
              How come you take into account who they've fought when it's Bradley/Guerrero but you don't when it's Khan/Alexander?

              Using your logic, Guerrero is twice as accomplished as Bradley. 4 divsion >>>>>2 divisions. No argument at all.
              Now can you finally admit that Alexander is more accomplished then Khan..

              Comment

              • Rome-By-Ko
                The winner Is
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Mar 2009
                • 20157
                • 323
                • 332
                • 29,833

                #67
                Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK
                You are actually saying that Adrien Broner is more accomplished than Bradley?
                He is,does not mean he beat better fighters or that he is the better fighter..Yet in the accomplishments department,he is more accomplished then Bradley..There is no denying it..

                Comment

                • Rome-By-Ko
                  The winner Is
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Mar 2009
                  • 20157
                  • 323
                  • 332
                  • 29,833

                  #68
                  Who is more accomplished,Mayweather or Pac??

                  Comment

                  • Dirk Diggler UK
                    Deleted
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Jun 2008
                    • 48836
                    • 1,312
                    • 693
                    • 58,902

                    #69
                    Originally posted by Rome-By-Ko
                    He is,does not mean he beat better fighters or that he is the better fighter..Yet in the accomplishments department,he is more accomplished then Bradley..There is no denying it..


                    You're a joke. Im done here

                    Comment

                    • Rome-By-Ko
                      The winner Is
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Mar 2009
                      • 20157
                      • 323
                      • 332
                      • 29,833

                      #70
                      Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK


                      You're a joke. Im done here
                      You been done once you shown the inability to deal with facts..

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP