Should the Pacquiao-Rios card be a PPV?
Collapse
-
-
Since when has "quality of the fight" ever determined if its a PPV or not? PPVs are determined by 1 thing, money. That's why fights like Floyd-Ortiz and Floyd-Guerrero were PPVComment
-
Both those Floyd fight weren't PPv worthy and I have posts saying that. If you want to look at it as an accountant then perhaps yes cause you can still sell Manny doing anything while Manny is still have sheep following. As a boxing fan I only pay for fights that mean something.Comment
-
As a boxing fan I wouldn't want any PPVs at all, who the hell wants to pay $75 for a fight that could literally last 20 seconds?Both those Floyd fight weren't PPv worthy and I have posts saying that. If you want to look at it as an accountant then perhaps yes cause you can still sell Manny doing anything while Manny is still have sheep following still. As a boxing fan I only pay for fights that mean something.
But against PPVs aren't determined by boxing fans. They are determined by money. PPVs are bad for the sport, they limit how many people actually watch the fights but make exponentially more money them any other methodComment
-
that's not true. with floyd you are almost guaranteed 12 rounds. 12 boring rounds but hey quantity over quality right?As a boxing fan I wouldn't want any PPVs at all, who the hell wants to pay $75 for a fight that could literally last 20 seconds?
But against PPVs aren't determined by boxing fans. They are determined by money. PPVs are bad for the sport, they limit how many people actually watch the fights but make exponentially more money them any other methodComment
Comment